首页> 外文期刊>Medical history >Drawing as Instrument, Drawings as Evidence: Capturing Mental Processes with Pencil and Paper
【24h】

Drawing as Instrument, Drawings as Evidence: Capturing Mental Processes with Pencil and Paper

机译:作为工具的绘画,作为证据的绘画:用铅笔和纸捕捉心理过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Researchers in the mind sciences often look to the production and analysis of drawings to reveal the mental processes of their subjects. This essay presents three episodes that trace the emergence of drawing as an instrumental practice in the study of the mind. Between 1880 and 1930, drawings gained currency as a form of scientific evidence - as stable, reproducible signals from a hidden interior. I begin with the use of drawings as data in the child study movement, move to the telepathic transmission of drawings in psychical research and conclude with the development of drawing as an experimental and diagnostic tool for studying neurological impairment. Despite significant shifts in the theoretical and disciplinary organisation of the mind sciences in the early twentieth century, researchers attempted to stabilise the use of subject-generated drawings as evidence by controlling the contexts in which drawings were produced and reproduced, and crafting subjects whose interiority could be effectively circumscribed. While movements such as psychoanalysis and art therapy would embrace the narrative interpretation of patient art, neuropsychology continued to utilise drawings as material traces of cognitive functions.
机译:心理科学领域的研究人员经常着眼于图纸的产生和分析,以揭示其受试者的心理过程。本文介绍了三个情节,这些情节追溯了绘画在思想研究中作为一种工具实践的出现。在1880年至1930年之间,图纸以科学证据的形式获得了流通-作为来自隐藏内部的稳定,可复制的信号。首先,我将绘画用作儿童研究运动中的数据,然后转向心理研究中的绘画的心灵感应传输,最后以绘画作为研究和诊断神经疾病的实验工具的发展作为结束。尽管在20世纪初期,心理科学的理论和学科组织发生了重大变化,但研究人员仍试图通过控制图纸的生成和复制环境,以及精心制作其内部性的主题,来稳定使用主题生成的图纸作为证据。被有效地限制。尽管诸如精神分析和艺术疗法之类的运动将包含对患者艺术的叙事性解释,但神经心理学继续将绘画作为认知功能的实质痕迹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号