...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of public health: Revue canadienne de sante publique >Socio-economic inequalities in cause-specific mortality: A 16-year follow-up study
【24h】

Socio-economic inequalities in cause-specific mortality: A 16-year follow-up study

机译:特定病因死亡率的社会经济不平等:一项为期16年的随访研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To examine socio-economic inequalities in cause-specific mortality by examining the independent effects of education, occupation and income in a population-based study of working-age Canadian adults. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from the 1991-2006 Canadian Census mortality and cancer follow-up study (n=2.7 million persons). For this analysis, the cohort was restricted to 2.3 million persons aged 25 to 64 at cohort inception, of whom 164,332 died during the follow-up period. Hazard ratios were calculated by educational attainment (4 levels), occupational skill (6 categories) and income adequacy (5 quintiles) for all-cause mortality and major causes of death. Models were run separately for men and women, controlled for multiple variables simultaneously, and some were stratified by 10-year age cohorts. RESULTS: The magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in mortality differed by indicator of socio-economic position (education, occupation, or income), age group, sex, and cause of death. Compared to age-adjusted models, hazard ratios were attenuated but remained significant in models that adjusted for both age and all three indicators of socio-economic position simultaneously. Socio-economic inequalities in mortality were evident for most of the major causes of death examined. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that education, occupation and income were each independently associated with mortality and were not simply proxies for each other. When evaluating socio-economic inequalities in mortality, it is important to use different indicators of socio-economic position to provide a more complete picture.
机译:目的:在以工作年龄的加拿大成年人为基础的人口研究中,通过研究教育,职业和收入的独立影响,研究特定原因死亡率的社会经济不平等现象。方法:这是对1991-2006年加拿大人口普查死亡率和癌症随访研究(n = 270万人)的数据的二次分析。为了进行此分析,该队列仅限于队列开始时的230万年龄在25至64岁之间的人群,其中164,332人在随访期间死亡。通过教育程度(4个级别),职业技能(6个类别)和收入充足性(5个五分位数)计算全因死亡率和主要死亡原因的危险比。分别针对男性和女性运行模型,同时控制多个变量,其中一些模型按10岁年龄组进行了分层。结果:死亡率的社会经济不平等程度因社会经济地位(教育程度,职业或收入),年龄段,性别和死亡原因而异。与年龄调整后的模型相比,风险比有所降低,但在同时调整了年龄和所有三个社会经济地位指标的模型中,危险比仍然显着。在所检查的大多数主要死亡原因中,死亡率的社会经济不平等现象显而易见。结论:这项研究表明,教育,职业和收入均与死亡率独立相关,而不仅仅是彼此的代理。在评估死亡率中的社会经济不平等时,重要的是使用社会经济地位的不同指标来提供更完整的图景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号