首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences >How useful is the ratio of fish density outside versus inside no-take marine reserves as a metric for fishery management control rules?
【24h】

How useful is the ratio of fish density outside versus inside no-take marine reserves as a metric for fishery management control rules?

机译:禁止捕捞的海洋保护区与禁止捕捞的内部海洋保护区之间的鱼类密度之比对渔业管理控制规则有多大作用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A management strategy evaluation (based on five species in the California, USA, nearshore fishery) of control rules that reduce relative fishing effort as a function of the ratio of fish density outside versus inside no-take marine reserves (as a measure of depletion) showed that although the control rules allowed effort to increase at first, in the long term, they were effective at maintaining spawning stock biomass and yield for all simulated species, including depleted ones. Scenarios with fish movement, illegal fishing in the reserve, or post-dispersal density dependence in recruitment required higher density ratio targets, such as 60% of mature fish or 80% of all fish, to avoid stock depletion. The effort allowed by multispecies density-ratio control rules depended on the relative weight given to more or less depleted species. High variability in recruitment or in monitoring data caused the allowable effort to fluctuate. Density-ratio control rules have the advantages that they require no historical data, they can be used at local spatial scales, and they adjust to changing environmental conditions.
机译:一种控制策略的管理策略评估(基于美国加利福尼亚的五种鱼类,近岸捕捞),可根据相对于内部不捕捞海洋保护区的鱼类密度与内部不捕捞海洋保护区的鱼类密度之比来减少相对捕捞努力(作为耗竭量的度量)结果表明,尽管控制规则最初允许增加努力,但从长远来看,它们可以有效地维持所有模拟物种(包括枯竭物种)的产卵生物量和产量。鱼类流动,在保护区非法捕捞或招募中分散后密度依赖的情况需要更高的密度比指标,例如60%的成熟鱼或80%的所有鱼,以避免种群枯竭。多物种密度比率控制规则所允许的努力取决于赋予或多或少消耗物种的相对权重。招聘或监视数据的高度可变性导致允许的工作波动。密度比控制规则的优点是不需要历史数据,可以在局部空间范围内使用,并且可以适应不断变化的环境条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号