首页> 外文期刊>Match >Quantitative Structure Property Relations (QSPRs) for Predicting Standard Absolute Entropy, S°298, of Inorganic Compounds
【24h】

Quantitative Structure Property Relations (QSPRs) for Predicting Standard Absolute Entropy, S°298, of Inorganic Compounds

机译:预测无机化合物的标准绝对熵S°298的定量结构性质关系(QSPR)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For predicting the standard entropy of inorganic compound, two novel connectivity indexes mQ, mG and their converse indexes mQ', mG' based on adjacency matrix of molecular graphs are proposed as follows: mQ=∑(qi.qj.qk...)0.5, mG = ∑ (gi.gj.gk...)0.5, mG=∑(g1.gj.gk...)0.5, mQ' =∑(qj.qj.qk...)-0.5 The qi and qj of adjacency matrix are defined as qi=(1+Zi) /(1+ni), gi=(1+Zi) /(1+ri+ri-1), where Zi, ni, ri are the charge number, the outer electronic shell primary quantum number, and the radii of ionic / respectively. The excellent QSPR models for the standard entropies can be constructed from 0Q, 0Q', 0G, 1G, and 1G', by using multivariate linear regression (MLR) method and artificial neural network (NN) method. The correlation coefficient r, the standard error, and the average error of the MLR model and NN model are 0.990, 0.992, 8.88 J.K-1.mol-1, 7.83 J.K-1.mol-1, 7.10 % and 6.36%, respectively, for 590 inorganic compounds. The cross-validation by using the leave-one-out method demonstrates that the MLR model is highly reliable from the point of view of statistics. The results show that the current method is more effective than literatme metliods for estimating the standard entropy of inorganic compound. Both MLR and NN methods can provide acceptable models for the prediction of the standard entropies. The NN model for the standard entropy appears to be more reliable than the MLR model.
机译:为了预测无机化合物的标准熵,提出了基于分子图邻接矩阵的两个新的连通性指标mQ,mG和其相反指标mQ',mG',分别为:mQ = ∑(qi.qj.qk ...) 0.5,mG = ∑(gi.gj.gk ...)0.5,mG = ∑(g1.gj.gk ...)0.5,mQ'= ∑(qj.qj.qk ...)-0.5邻接矩阵的q和qj定义为qi =(1 + Zi)/(1 + ni),gi =(1 + Zi)/(1 + ri + ri-1),其中Zi,ni,ri是电荷数,电子外壳的基本量子数和离子半径/。通过使用多元线性回归(MLR)方法和人工神经网络(NN)方法,可以从0Q,0Q',0G,1G和1G'构建出色的标准熵QSPR模型。 MLR模型和NN模型的相关系数r,标准误差和平均误差分别为0.990、0.992、8.88 JK-1.mol-1、7.83 JK-1.mol-1、7.10%和6.36% ,用于590种无机化合物。使用留一法的交叉验证表明,从统计的角度来看,MLR模型是高度可靠的。结果表明,当前方法在估计无机化合物的标准熵方面比文学方法更有效。 MLR和NN方法都可以为标准熵的预测提供可接受的模型。用于标准熵的NN模型似乎比MLR模型更可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号