...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Forest Research >Predicting forest growth based on airborne light detection and ranging data, climate data, and a simplified process-based model.
【24h】

Predicting forest growth based on airborne light detection and ranging data, climate data, and a simplified process-based model.

机译:根据机载光检测和测距数据,气候数据以及基于过程的简化模型,预测森林的生长。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Increasing use of airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) in forest inventories offers new possibilities to apply process-based forest models (PBM) in practice. We present a new approach, where a simplified PBM is run using inputs derived from the LiDAR data. The PBM was built by combining several existing models together, and it was tested with 52 Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) dominated sample plots in Finland with the LiDAR (PBM_LIDAR) and field (PMB_FIELD) inputs. The results were compared with empirical growth predictions (EM_FIELD) and field reference growth. LiDAR-based stand variables (mean height of tree and crown base and leaf area index) were, on average, well in line with the field measurements. Basal area growth was slightly underestimated with the PBM_LIDAR (bias 4.1%), root mean square prediction error (RMSPE, 26.7%) and overestimated with the PBM_FIELD (bias -10.2%, RMSPE 33.3%), the EM_FIELD being the least biased (bias -1.9%, RMSPE of 24.6%). The bias varied with stand age and fertility. The dependence on field reference growth was highest with EM_FIELD and PBM_LIDAR (R2=0.47 and 0.34, respectively), and lowest with PBM_FIELD (R2=0.18). Despite several development needs, the approach is promising for easy incorporation of canopy and weather data into forest growth predictions.
机译:森林清单中机载光检测和测距(LiDAR)的使用越来越多,为在实践中应用基于过程的森林模型(PBM)提供了新的可能性。我们提出了一种新方法,其中使用从LiDAR数据得出的输入来运行简化的PBM。通过将几个现有模型组合在一起来构建PBM,并使用52个以苏格兰松树(Pinus sylvestris L.)为主的芬兰样地进行了测试,并使用了LiDAR(PBM_LIDAR)和现场(PMB_FIELD)输入。将结果与经验增长预测(EM_FIELD)和现场参考增长进行了比较。基于LiDAR的林分变量(树木和树冠基部的平均高度和叶面积指数)平均而言与田间测量结果非常吻合。基底面积的增长被PBM_LIDAR(偏差4.1%),均方根预测误差(RMSPE,26.7%)略低,而被PBM_FIELD(偏差-10.2%,RMSPE 33.3%)高估了,EM_FIELD的偏差最小(偏差-1.9%,RMSPE为24.6%)。偏见随林分年龄和生育力而变化。 EM_FIELD和PBM_LIDAR对场参考生长的依赖性最高(分别为R 2 = 0.47和0.34),而PBM_FIELD的依赖性最低(R 2 = 0.18)。尽管有一些发展需求,但该方法有望将树冠和天气数据轻松纳入森林生长预测中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号