...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of gastroenterology >Antidepressant prophylaxis reduces depression risk but does not improve sustained virological response in hepatitis C patients receiving interferon without depression at baseline: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Antidepressant prophylaxis reduces depression risk but does not improve sustained virological response in hepatitis C patients receiving interferon without depression at baseline: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:预防抗抑郁药可降低基线时无抑郁症接受干扰素的丙型肝炎患者的抑郁症风险,但不能改善其持续的病毒学应答:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Depression complicates interferon-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) antiviral therapy in 10% to 40% of cases, and diminishes patient well-being and ability to complete a full course of therapy. As a consequence, the likelihood of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR [ie, permanent viral eradication]) is reduced. OBJeCTive: To systematically review the evidence of whether preemptive antidepressant prophylaxis started before HCV antiviral initiation is beneficial. MeThOds: Inclusion was restricted to randomized controlled trials in which prophylactic antidepressant therapy was started at least two weeks before the initiation of HCV antiviral treatment. Studies pertaining to patients with active or recent depressive symptoms before commencing HCV antiviral therapy were excluded. English language articles from 1946 to July 2012 were included. The MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central databases were searched. Where possible, meta-analyses were conducted evaluating the effect of antidepressant prophylaxis on SVR and major depression as well as on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Beck Depression Index scores at four, 12 and 24 weeks. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess bias risk. resuLTs: Six randomized clinical trials involving 522 patients met the inclusion criteria. Although the frequency of on-treatment clinical depression was decreased with antidepressant prophylaxis (risk ratio 0.60 [95% CI 0.38 to 0.93]; P=0.02; I2=24%), no benefit to SVR was identified (risk ratio 1.08 [95% CI 0.74 to 1.57]; P=0.69; I2=58%). COnCLusiOn: This practice is not justified to improve SVR in populations free of active depressive symptoms leading up to HCV antiviral therapy.
机译:背景:抑郁症会使10%至40%的病例中的基于干扰素的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)抗病毒治疗复杂化,并降低患者的健康状况和完成完整疗程的能力。结果,降低了实现持续病毒学应答(SVR [即,永久性病毒根除])的可能性。目的:系统评价在HCV抗病毒治疗开始之前先进行预防性抗抑郁药是否有益的证据。方法:纳入仅限于随机对照试验,其中在开始HCV抗病毒治疗之前至少两周开始进行预防性抗抑郁治疗。排除有关在开始HCV抗病毒治疗之前出现活动性或近期抑郁症状的患者的研究。收录了1946年至2012年7月的英语文章。搜索MEDLINE,Embase和Cochrane Central数据库。在可能的情况下,进行了荟萃分析,评估了抗抑郁药预防对SVR和重度抑郁以及在4、12和24周时对Montgomery-Asberg抑郁量表和贝克抑郁指数的影响。使用Cochrane协作工具评估偏倚风险。结果:涉及522名患者的六项随机临床试验符合纳入标准。尽管通过抗抑郁药预防措施降低了治疗中临床抑郁症的发生频率(风险比0.60 [95%CI 0.38至0.93]; P = 0.02; I2 = 24%),但未发现对SVR有益处(风险比1.08 [95% CI 0.74至1.57]; P = 0.69; I2 = 58%)。结论:在没有导致HCV抗病毒治疗的活动性抑郁症状的人群中,这种做法不能改善SVR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号