首页> 外文期刊>Management science: Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences >Trading higher software piracy for higher profits: The case of phantom piracy
【24h】

Trading higher software piracy for higher profits: The case of phantom piracy

机译:以更高的软件盗版交易获得更高的利润:幻像盗版案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Faced with the sustained problem of piracy that costs nearly $40 billion in annual revenue losses, the software industry has adopted a number of technical, legal, and economic strategies to curb piracy and stem the resulting losses. Our work complements and contributes to the existing literature by exploring the possible effect of another economic lever-product bundling-on the relationship governing piracy and seller profits. The traditional economic rationale of demand pooling from bundling that enables sellers to extract higher surplus and its particular attractiveness for information goods with negligible marginal and bundling costs carry over to our analysis. However, the presence of piracy injects several new facets to our analysis. Bundling creates a shared level of piracy of disparate products, and under certain conditions to the detriment of one of the products. We argue that by construction of the copyright laws, the act of bundling itself can have a deterrence effect. This deterrence effect, along with shared piracy of products and demand pooling are ingredients that together dictate the overall piracy, pricing, profit, and welfare outcomes. Our analysis reveals several interesting insights. Bundling can be profitable even when the very act of bundling increases the piracy level of one of the products in the bundle. Termed phantom piracy, this represents a situation where sellers trade off higher piracy for one product in favor of lower piracy for the other product while deriving overall higher profits. Extensive simulation analysis shows that the region of phantom piracy is vastly expanded when additional products are introduced to the bundle. Conversely, under certain conditions, a profit maximizing seller opts not to bundle even when bundling can serve to lower the overall level of piracy. Price discounts that are typically offered by bundling are sharply deepened when piracy enters the equation. When piracy is a phenomenon to contend with, product bundling always increases consumer surplus even in scenarios where the seller may not realize higher profits. Unlike other forms of price discrimination that are often viewed by consumers with a jaundiced eye as they attempt to extract additional surplus from the consumers, product bundling in the software context can be a win-win scenario for both the buyers and the sellers.
机译:面对持续存在的盗版问题,盗版每年造成近400亿美元的收入损失,软件行业采取了多种技术,法律和经济策略来遏制盗版并阻止由此造成的损失。我们的工作通过探索另一种经济杠杆产品捆绑对支配盗版和卖方利润关系的可能影响,对现有文献进行补充和贡献。捆绑销售带来的传统经济需求原理可以使卖方从中获得更高的剩余,其对边际成本和捆绑成本可忽略不计的信息商品的特殊吸引力也可以用于我们的分析。但是,盗版的存在为我们的分析注入了几个新的方面。捆绑销售会造成不同产品的盗版行为达到共同水平,并且在某些情况下会损害其中一种产品。我们认为,通过制定版权法,捆绑行为本身可以起到威慑作用。这种威慑效应,以及共同的产品盗版和需求共享,共同决定了整体盗版,定价,利润和福利结果。我们的分析揭示了一些有趣的见解。即使捆绑销售行为实际上会增加捆绑销售产品之一的盗版水平,捆绑销售也会有利可图。所谓的幻影盗版,是指卖方以一种产品的较高盗版为代价,转而以另一种产品的较低盗版为代价,同时获得了总体较高的利润。广泛的仿真分析表明,将附加产品引入捆绑销售后,幻像盗版的范围将大大扩展。相反,在某些情况下,即使捆绑销售可以降低整体盗版水平,最大化利润的卖方也选择不捆绑销售。当盗版进入等式时,通常由捆绑提供的价格折扣会急剧加深。如果要打击盗版现象,即使在卖方可能未实现更高利润的情况下,产品捆绑销售也总是会增加消费者剩余。不同于其他形式的价格歧视,当消费者试图从消费者那里获取额外的盈余时,通常会被黄褐色的眼睛所看待,在软件环境中,产品捆绑销售对于买卖双方都是双赢的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号