首页> 外文期刊>Management science: Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences >Research Note—Competitive Bundling and Counterbundling with Generalist and Specialist Firms
【24h】

Research Note—Competitive Bundling and Counterbundling with Generalist and Specialist Firms

机译:研究报告—与通用公司和专业公司的竞争性捆绑销售和反捆绑销售

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bundling, which is the practice of selling two or more products or services in a package, is a pervasive marketing practice and is often used as a strategic competitive tool. However, there has not been enough consideration of competitive bundling situations in which exit of a competitor is not a concern. In this paper, we address this issue by identifying conditions under which strategic competitors may or may not resort to bundling when competitor exit considerations are absent. We study competition between a multiproduct generalist firm and two single-product specialist firms in two product categories, one of which has undifferentiated products and the other has differentiated products. In our model, the specialist firms can form an alliance to bundle their products in competing with the generalist firm. In contrast to the previous literature, we find that concurrent bundling by competitors, if it occurs in equilibrium, is profitable. We also find that when one competitor bundles and the other does not, the bundling firm gains a greater share of customers and makes a higher profit. However, when conditions favor counterbundling by a competitor, such counterbundling helps the competitor retain its customers. Finally, we note that under other market conditions, concurrent bundling by competitors escalates price competition to the extent that retaining customers through bundling is not profitable. In such a case, we show that strategic competitors are better off having asymmetric product lines with one competitor bundling and the other selling unbundled.
机译:捆绑销售是打包销售两种或多种产品或服务的一种做法,是一种普遍的营销做法,通常被用作战略竞争工具。但是,没有充分考虑竞争性捆绑情况的问题,在这种情况下,竞争者的退出并不是问题。在本文中,我们通过确定在没有竞争对手退出考虑的情况下战略竞争对手可能会或可能不会选择捆绑的条件来解决此问题。我们研究了多产品多用途公司和两家单产品专家公司之间在两种产品类别中的竞争,其中一种具有未区分的产品,另一种具有差异的产品。在我们的模型中,专业公司可以结成联盟,将其产品与通用公司竞争。与先前的文献相比,我们发现如果竞争者的并发捆绑是均衡的,那是有利可图的。我们还发现,当一个竞争者捆绑而另一竞争者不捆绑时,捆绑的公司获得了更大的客户份额并获得了更高的利润。但是,当条件有利于竞争对手进行捆绑销售时,这种捆绑销售可以帮助竞争对手留住客户。最后,我们注意到,在其他市场条件下,竞争对手的并发捆绑会加剧价格竞争,以至于通过捆绑留住客户无法获利。在这种情况下,我们表明,战略竞争者最好拥有不对称的产品线,其中一个竞争对手捆绑销售,而另一种则捆绑销售。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号