首页> 外文期刊>Manual therapy. >Self-reported pain severity, quality of life, disability, anxiety and depression in patients classified with 'nociceptive', 'peripheral neuropathic' and 'central sensitisation' pain. The discriminant validity of mechanisms-based classifications of low back (±leg) pain
【24h】

Self-reported pain severity, quality of life, disability, anxiety and depression in patients classified with 'nociceptive', 'peripheral neuropathic' and 'central sensitisation' pain. The discriminant validity of mechanisms-based classifications of low back (±leg) pain

机译:自我报告的疼痛严重程度,生活质量,残疾,焦虑和抑郁症,分为“伤害性”,“周围神经性”和“中央敏化”疼痛。基于机制的下腰(±腿)痛分类的判别有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evidence of validity is required to support the use of mechanisms-based classifications of pain clinically. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discriminant validity of 'nociceptive' (NP), 'peripheral neuropathic' (PNP) and 'central sensitisation' (CSP) as mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back (±leg) pain by evaluating the extent to which patients classified in this way differ from one another according to health measures associated with various dimensions of pain.This study employed a cross-sectional, between-subjects design. Four hundred and sixty-four patients with low back (±leg) pain were assessed using a standardised assessment protocol. Clinicians classified each patient's pain using a mechanisms-based classification approach. Patients completed a number of self-report measures associated with pain severity, health-related quality of life, functional disability, anxiety and depression. Discriminant validity was evaluated using a multivariate analysis of variance.There was a statistically significant difference between pain classifications on the combined self-report measures, (p=.001; Pillai's Trace=.33; partial eta squared=.16). Patients classified with CSP (n=106) reported significantly more severe pain, poorer general health-related quality of life, and greater levels of back pain-related disability, depression and anxiety compared to those classified with PNP (n=102) and NP (n=256). A similar pattern was found in patients with PNP compared to NP.Mechanisms-based pain classifications may reflect meaningful differences in attributes underlying the multidimensionality of pain. Further studies are required to evaluate the construct and criterion validity of mechanisms-based classifications of musculoskeletal pain.
机译:需要有效证据来支持临床使用基于机制的疼痛分类。这项研究的目的是评估“伤害感受性”(NP),“周围神经病变”(PNP)和“中央敏化”(CSP)作为基于机理的腰背疼痛患者分类的有效性(±腿)通过评估与疼痛的各个方面相关的健康指标,评估以这种方式分类的患者彼此之间的差异程度。本研究采用横断面,受试者间设计。使用标准化评估方案评估了644例腰背(±腿)疼痛患者。临床医生使用基于机制的分类方法对每个患者的疼痛进行分类。患者完成了许多与疼痛严重程度,健康相关的生活质量,功能障碍,焦虑和抑郁有关的自我报告措施。使用多变量方差分析评估判别效度。在综合自我报告测度的疼痛分类之间存在统计学上的显着差异(p = .001; Pillai's Trace = .33;偏η平方= .16)。与PNP(n = 102)和NP分类的患者相比,CSP(n = 106)分类的患者报告的疼痛更严重,与健康相关的一般生活质量较差,并且与背痛相关的残疾,抑郁和焦虑水平更高(n = 256)。与NP相比,PNP患者发现了类似的模式。基于机理的疼痛分类可能反映了疼痛多维属性的有意义差异。需要进一步的研究来评估基于机制的肌肉骨骼疼痛分类的构造和标准有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号