首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Analgesic, sedative, antipsychotic, and neuromuscular blocker use in Canadian intensive care units: A prospective, multicentre, observational study
【24h】

Analgesic, sedative, antipsychotic, and neuromuscular blocker use in Canadian intensive care units: A prospective, multicentre, observational study

机译:在加拿大重症监护病房使用镇痛药,镇静药,抗精神病药和神经肌肉阻滞剂:一项前瞻性,多中心,观察性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Our aim was to describe analgo-sedation and antipsychotic and neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD) use in critically ill patients, management strategies, and variables associated with these practice patterns. Methods: This prospective observational study in 51 intensive care units (ICUs) included all patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) over a two-week period during 2008-2009. Results: We included 712 patients representing 3,620 patient-days. Median MV duration was 3.0 days (interquartile range 2-6). During MV, 92% of patients received analgo-sedation, 32% an adjunct agent (e.g., acetaminophen), 18% NMBDs, and 10% antipsychotics. Opioids were used more frequently than benzodiazepines or propofol (84.8% vs 62.2% vs 10.1% patients, respectively, P < 0.0001). Independent predictors of opioid and benzodiazepine use were a longer MV duration, assessment scales, physical restraints, and university-affiliated hospital. Although more than 50% of ICUs reported that assessment tools, protocols, and daily sedation interruption (DSI) were available for use, application was modest: sedation scale 53.0%, pain scale 19.1%, delirium scale 5.2%, protocol 25.0%, DSI 42.1%. Accidental device removal occurred in 4.6% of patients, with 75.8% of events during DSI. Daily sedation interruption was associated with protocol use, physical restraints, university-affiliated hospital, and short-duration MV. Variables associated with protocol use included assessment scales, longer MV duration, lack of physical restraints, and admission to a community hospital. Conclusion: Nearly all MV patients received analgo-sedation. Opioids were used more often than sedatives despite infrequent use of pain scales. Few patients received antipsychotic therapy, but physical restraint was common. Protocol use was poor compared to DSI. Duration of MV predicted the use of either.
机译:目的:我们的目的是描述重症患者的镇静镇静,抗精神病药和神经肌肉阻滞药(NMBD)的使用,治疗策略以及与这些实践模式相关的变量。方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究在51个重症监护病房(ICU)中纳入了在2008-2009年两周内接受了有创机械通气(MV)的所有患者。结果:我们纳入712名患者,代表3,620个患者日。中位MV持续时间为3.0天(四分位间距2-6)。在MV期间,有92%的患者接受了镇静镇静剂,32%的辅助药(例如对乙酰氨基酚),18%的NMBD和10%的抗精神病药。阿片类药物的使用频率高于苯二氮卓类或丙泊酚(分别为84.8%,62.2%和10.1%的患者,P <0.0001)。阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物使用的独立预测因素是较长的MV持续时间,评估量表,身体约束和大学附属医院。尽管超过50%的ICU报告说可以使用评估工具,方案和每日镇静中断(DSI),但应用适度:镇静等级53.0%,疼痛等级19.1%,del妄等级5.2%,方案25.0%,DSI 42.1%。 4.6%的患者发生了意外的器械移除,在DSI期间发生了75.8%的事件。每天的镇静中断与方案使用,身体约束,大学附属医院和短期MV相关。与方案使用相关的变量包括评估量表,较长的MV持续时间,缺乏身体约束以及入社区医院。结论:几乎所有的MV患者均接受了镇静剂。尽管很少使用疼痛量表,但使用阿片类药物的次数要比镇静剂多。很少有患者接受抗精神病药物治疗,但身体约束很常见。与DSI相比,协议使用情况较差。 MV的持续时间可预测两者的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号