首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Multiple treatment comparison analysis: If A is better than B, and B is better than C, is A better than C? [L'analyse de comparaison de plusieurs traitements: Si A est mieux que B, et B est mieux que C, A est-il mieux que C?]
【24h】

Multiple treatment comparison analysis: If A is better than B, and B is better than C, is A better than C? [L'analyse de comparaison de plusieurs traitements: Si A est mieux que B, et B est mieux que C, A est-il mieux que C?]

机译:多次治疗比较分析:如果A优于B,B优于C,A是否优于C? [几种治疗方法的比较分析:如果A优于B,B优于C,A是否优于C?]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this issue of the Journal, Rashiq et al. present a multiple treatment comparison (MTC) analysis to determine which of many possible anesthetic techniques is the most effective in reducing acute pain intensity and the occurrence of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing surgical repair of a hip fracture. Although MTCs are seen increasingly in the medical literature, a rudimentary search (Appendix) conducted in Medline yields only one other MTC in the anesthesia literature.
机译:在本期杂志中,Rashiq等人。本文提出了一种多药治疗比较(MTC)分析,以确定在接受髋部骨折手术修复的患者中,多种可能的麻醉技术中哪种最能减轻急性疼痛强度和术后del妄的发生。尽管在医学文献中越来越多地看到MTC,但在Medline中进行的基本搜索(附录)仅在麻醉文献中产生了另一种MTC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号