...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Intraoperative detection of segmental wall motion abnormalities with transesophageal echocardiography.
【24h】

Intraoperative detection of segmental wall motion abnormalities with transesophageal echocardiography.

机译:经食道超声心动图术中检测节段性壁运动异常。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare two methods of analysis of regional wall-motion (RWM) using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were studied. The transgastric short axis view at the mid-papillary level was recorded before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. All images were reviewed by an anesthesiologist trained in TEE and an echocardiographer. Regional wall motion was graded: 1 normal, 2 hypokinetic, 3 akinetic, and 4 dyskinetic. The left ventricle was evaluated according to the guidelines of the American Society of Echocardiography using 6-segment, and 4-segment models. Agreement between observers (interobservers), and for one observer at two different moments (intraobservers), for grading each segment was defined as RWM abnormality scores within 1 grade. A wall-motion score index (WMSI), which is the sum of individual scores divided by the number of segments visualized, was calculated. A Bland Altman analysis was used to assess interobserver variability. RESULTS: Agreement between observers occurred in 96% and 94% of the examined segments, using 4- and 6-segment models respectively. Intraobserver agreement was 99% and 97% for the 4- and 6-segment models. The mean differences (bias) of the interobserver variability in grading the segments were 0.04 +/- 0.79 and 0 +/- 0.72 using a 4- or 6-segment model. The mean difference of the interobserver variability in WMSI were -0.05 +/- 0.42 and 0.05 +/- 0.37 using a 4- or a 6-segment model. CONCLUSION: Both methods, using either a 4- or a 6-segment model, result in a high intraobserver and interobserver agreement, and a low interobserver variability.
机译:目的:比较两种经食道超声心动图(TEE)分析区域壁运动(RWM)的方法。方法:对30例接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者进行了研究。记录了体外循环前后在乳头中段的经胃短轴视图。所有图像均由经过TEE培训的麻醉师和超声心动图医师进行审查。区域壁运动分级:1正常,2运动不足,3运动不足和4运动障碍。根据美国超声心动图学会的指南,使用6段和4段模型评估左心室。观察者(观察者之间)以及对于一个观察者在两个不同时刻(观察者内部)之间的一致性,对每个片段进行评分定义为1级内的RWM异常评分。计算壁运动得分指数(WMSI),它是各个得分的总和除以可视化段的数量。 Bland Altman分析用于评估观察者之间的变异性。结果:分别使用4段模型和6段模型的观察者之间,在96%和94%的观察者之间达成了共识。 4段和6段模型的观察者内部一致性分别为99%和97%。使用4或6段模型,观察者之间的可变性在对段进行评分时的平均差(bias)为0.04 +/- 0.79和0 +/- 0.72。使用4或6段模型,WMSI中观察者间差异的平均差异为-0.05 +/- 0.42和0.05 +/- 0.37。结论:两种方法都使用4或6段模型,导致观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性高,观察者之间的变异性低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号