...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Tracheal pressure regulated volume assist ventilation in acute respiratory failure.
【24h】

Tracheal pressure regulated volume assist ventilation in acute respiratory failure.

机译:气管压力调节量有助于急性呼吸衰竭的通气。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) uses volume assist (VAV) and flow assist ventilation (FAV) to reduce elastic and resistive effort, respectively. Proportional assist ventilation may be difficult to apply clinically, particularly due to FAV related considerations. It was hypothesized that regulating tracheal (Ptr) rather than airway opening pressure (Pao), to overcome endotracheal tube related resistive effort, during VAV would provide an effective alternative method of ventilation. We therefore compared the effects of Pao and Ptr regulated VAV on breathing pattern and inspiratory effort. METHODS: In seven intubated patients, flow, volume, Pao, Ptr, esophageal and transdiaphragmatic pressure were measured during VAV (0-80% respiratory system elastance) using Pao vs Ptr to regulate ventilator applied pressure. Breathing pattern and the pressure-time integral of the inspiratory muscles (integralP(mus) . dt) and diaphragm (integralP(di) . dt) were determined. RESULTS: Compared to spontaneous breathing, the respiratory rate to tidal volume ratio, or rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), improved progressively with increasing VAV (130 +/- 64 vs 70 +/- 35, VAV 0 vs 80%; P < 0.05) while inspiratory effort fell (integralP(mus) . dt = 39.6 +/- 7.5 vs 28.5 +/- 7.2 cm H(2)O.sec.L(-1), integralP(di) . dt, = 35.4 +/- 7.8 vs 24.2 +/- 5.9 cm H(2)O.sec.L(-1), VAV 0 vs 80%; P < 0.05) due to a decrease in elastic related effort. At any given level of support, there was further reduction in RSBI, integralP(mus) . dt, and integralP(di) . dt (which averaged 23.6 +/- 2.7, 33.7 +/- 4.4, and 38.5 +/- 5.1%, respectively; P < 0.05) for Ptr compared to Pao regulated VAV due to a decrease in resistive effort. CONCLUSIONS: Tracheal pressure regulated VAV can be a simple and effective method of partial ventilatory support in acute respiratory failure. Further work will be needed to determine its efficacy and potential benefit relative to PAV and other modes of ventilation in routine clinical practice.
机译:目的:比例辅助通气(PAV)使用容积辅助(VAV)和流量辅助通气(FAV)分别减少弹性和阻力。比例辅助通气可能很难在临床上应用,尤其是由于与FAV相关的考虑。假设在VAV期间调节气管(Ptr)而不是气道打开压力(Pao),以克服气管内导管相关的阻力,将提供一种有效的通气方法。因此,我们比较了Pao和Ptr调节的VAV对呼吸模式和吸气努力的影响。方法:在7例插管患者中,使用Pao vs Ptr调节呼吸机施加的压力,测量VAV(0-80%呼吸系统弹性)期间的流量,体积,Pao,Ptr,食管和trans肌压力。确定呼吸模式和吸气肌肉(integralP(mus).dt)和diaphragm肌(integralP(di).dt)的压力-时间积分。结果:与自发呼吸相比,呼吸速率与潮气量之比或快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)随着VAV的增加而逐渐改善(130 +/- 64 vs 70 +/- 35,VAV 0 vs 80%; P < 0.05)而吸气量下降(integralP(mus)。dt = 39.6 +/- 7.5与28.5 +/- 7.2 cm H(2)O.sec.L(-1),integrateP(di)。dt = 35.4 + /-7.8 vs 24.2 +/- 5.9 cm H(2)O.sec.L(-1),VAV 0 vs 80%; P <0.05),这是由于与弹性有关的努力减少了。在任何给定的支持水平下,RSBI,integralP(mus)都会进一步降低。 dt和积分P(di)。与Pao调节的VAV相比,Ptr的dt dt(分别平均为23.6 +/- 2.7、33.7 +/- 4.4和38.5 +/- 5.1%; P <0.05),原因是阻力降低。结论:气管压力调节VAV可作为急性呼吸衰竭中部分通气支持的一种简单有效的方法。在常规临床实践中,需要进一步的工作来确定其相对于PAV和其他通气方式的功效和潜在益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号