...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Automatic administration of propofol and remifentanil guided by the bispectral index during rigid bronchoscopic procedures: A randomized trial
【24h】

Automatic administration of propofol and remifentanil guided by the bispectral index during rigid bronchoscopic procedures: A randomized trial

机译:刚性支气管镜检查过程中双光谱指数指导的异丙酚和瑞芬太尼的自动给药:一项随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopic procedures is a demanding procedure. Automatic titration of propofol and remifentanil to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) within the recommended range (40-60) has been reported during routine surgical procedures. The aim of the present study was to evaluate its use during rigid bronchoscopy. Methods: Patients were enrolled in a randomized study comparing manual target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil (manual TCI group) with automatic titration guided by the BIS (dual-loop group). Categorical variables were compared by the Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables (median [interquartile range 25-75]) were compared by the Mann-Whitney test. Results: Thirty-four patients were included in the manual TCI group and 33 were included in the dual-loop group. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the groups. Intervention by the anesthesiologist in charge to modify propofol and/or remifentanil targets in the dual-loop group was not necessary. Percentage of time spent in the BIS interval (40-60) was similar in the manual TCI and dual-loop groups (69% [48-79] vs 70% [58-80], respectively). Durations of induction and of maintenance and propofol and remifentanil doses were also similar between groups, except for the amount of propofol needed for induction (P = 0.002). Time to tracheal extubation was also similar. No case of intraoperational awareness was detected. Conclusion: The present study could not establish the superiority of automatic system over manual adjustment for bronchoscopy. Further studies with a different design and a larger number of patients are required to establish the place of automatic delivery of anesthetic agents. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00571181.
机译:背景:硬支气管镜手术的麻醉是一项苛刻的手术。据报道,在常规外科手术过程中,自动滴定了异丙酚和瑞芬太尼以将双光谱指数(BIS)维持在推荐范围(40-60)。本研究的目的是评估其在硬支气管镜检查中的使用。方法:将患者纳入一项随机研究,比较手动靶控输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼(手动TCI组)与BIS指导的自动滴定(双环组)。分类变量通过Fisher精确检验进行比较,连续变量(中位数[四分位间距25-75])通过Mann-Whitney检验进行比较。结果:手工TCI组包括34例患者,双环组包括33例。两组之间基线特征很好地平衡。不需要由麻醉医师干预以修改双环组中的异丙酚和/或瑞芬太尼靶标。在BTC间隔(40-60)中花费的时间百分比在手动TCI和双环组中相似(分别为69%[48-79]和70%[58-80])。各组间诱导和维持的持续时间以及丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的剂量也相似,除了诱导所需的丙泊酚量(P = 0.002)。气管拔管的时间也相似。没有发现手术中意识的情况。结论:目前的研究无法建立自动系统优于人工调整支气管镜的优势。需要使用不同的设计和更多的患者进行进一步的研究,以建立自动递送麻醉剂的场所。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT00571181。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号