...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >The epidural electric stimulation test does not predict local anesthetic spread or consumption in labour epidural analgesia
【24h】

The epidural electric stimulation test does not predict local anesthetic spread or consumption in labour epidural analgesia

机译:硬膜外电刺激试验不能预测局部麻醉药在分娩硬膜外镇痛中的扩散或消耗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: The epidural electrical stimulation test (EEST) is a highly specific and sensitive test for confirming placement of the epidural catheter in the epidural space. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the EEST could predict the spread and consumption of local anesthetic solutions during labour epidural analgesia. Methods: This observational study was conducted in labouring parturients requesting epidural analgesia. The EEST was performed after the epidural catheter placement (T0) and repeated five minutes after a test dose with 2% lidocaine 3 mL (T1). The minimum current required to elicit the motor response at each time point was recorded. A loading dose of 0.125% bupivacaine 10 mL and fentanyl 50 μg was administered and followed by patient-controlled epidural analgesia with 0.0625% bupivacaine and fentanyl 2 μg·mL-1 (baseline infusion 10 mL·hr-1, bolus dose 5 mL, lockout interval ten minutes, maximum dose 20 mL·hr -1). The primary outcome was the correlation between the current required to elicit motor responses at T0 and T1 and the consumption of bupivacaine in the first two hours of epidural administration. The secondary outcomes included the muscle contraction patterns determined by the EEST and the incidence of failed, inadequate, or asymmetric blocks. Results: The study was conducted in 102 parturients. The mean electric current required to elicit muscle response was 4.43 mA (range 1-10 mA) at T0, 5.97 mA (range 1-14 mA) at T1, and the mean Δ (T1-T0) current was 1.54 mA (range 0-8 mA). There was no correlation between either the mean baseline current required or the Δ (T1-T0) current and the total bupivacaine consumption at two hours. The incidence of inadequate blocks at two hours was 18%; however, none of the catheters required replacement. Unilateral left (34%) or right (31%) leg contraction was the most frequent pattern elicited by the EEST. Conclusions: The EEST shows a wide range of electrical current requirements and elicits a variety of muscle twitch patterns on the lower limbs. Although it confirms the epidural placement of the catheter, the EEST cannot be used to predict the spread or consumption of the local anesthetic solution during labour epidural analgesia.
机译:目的:硬膜外电刺激测试(EEST)是一种高度特异性且灵敏的测试,用于确认硬膜外导管在硬膜外腔中的位置。这项研究的目的是调查EEST是否可以预测分娩硬膜外镇痛过程中局部麻醉药溶液的扩散和消耗。方法:这项观察性研究是在要求硬膜外镇痛的产妇中进行的。在硬膜外导管置入后(T0)进行EEST,并在2%利多卡因3 mL(T1)的测试剂量后重复五分钟。记录在每个时间点引起电动机响应所需的最小电流。给予0.125%布比卡因10 mL和芬太尼50μg的负荷剂量,然后由患者控制的硬膜外镇痛,使用0.0625%布比卡因和芬太尼2μg·mL-1(基线输注10 mL·hr-1,大剂量5 mL,锁定间隔十分钟,最大剂量20 mL·hr -1)。主要结果是在硬膜外给药的前两个小时内在T0和T1引起运动反应所需的电流与布比卡因的消耗之间的相关性。次要结果包括由EEST确定的肌肉收缩模式以及失败,不充分或不对称传导阻滞的发生率。结果:本研究在102名产妇中进行。引起肌肉反应所需的平均电流在T0处为4.43 mA(范围1-10 mA),在T1处为5.97 mA(范围1-14 mA),平均Δ(T1-T0)电流为1.54 mA(范围0 -8 mA)。 2小时时所需的平均基线电流或Δ(T1-T0)电流与布比卡因总消耗量之间没有相关性。两小时内阻塞不足的发生率为18%;但是,没有导管需要更换。 EEST引起的单侧左腿收缩(34%)或右腿收缩(31%)是最常见的模式。结论:EEST显示了各种各样的电流需求,并引起了下肢的各种肌肉抽搐模式。尽管可以确定导管的硬膜外位置,但EEST不能用于预测分娩硬膜外镇痛过程中局部麻醉药的扩散或消耗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号