...
首页> 外文期刊>Functional Ecology >Assessing the evidence for latitudinal gradients in plant defence and herbivory. (Special Issue: Evolutionary ecology of plant defences against herbivores.)
【24h】

Assessing the evidence for latitudinal gradients in plant defence and herbivory. (Special Issue: Evolutionary ecology of plant defences against herbivores.)

机译:评估植物防御和食草中纬度梯度的证据。 (特刊:植物防御草食动物的进化生态学。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The idea that biotic interactions, including herbivory, predation and competition are more intense at lower latitudes is widely accepted and underpins several dominant theories on the latitudinal gradient in biodiversity. Current theory also predicts that the intense biotic interactions at low latitudes will select plants for greater defence against herbivores. We reviewed the literature to provide an assessment of the evidence for and against the hypothesis that herbivory is more intense at lower latitudes, and that plants from low latitudes are better defended than are plants from high latitudes. Only 37% of the 38 latitudinal comparisons of herbivory showed higher herbivory at lower latitudes, and the average effect size in a meta-analysis was not significantly different from zero. Thus, the available data do not support the idea that herbivory is generally more intense in the tropics. Only nine of 56 comparisons found higher chemical defences at lower latitudes, and a meta-analysis showed that overall, chemical defences were significantly higher in plants from higher latitudes. This result is counter to the predictions of much of the literature. A meta-analysis showed no significant effect of latitude on physical defence. A review of the literature on feeding trials and common garden experiments showed that herbivores tend to prefer tissue from high latitudes. This trend could stem from differences in overall defence that were not captured by the metrics used in the literature, but could also result from differences in nutritional quality. The empirical data do not support the widespread view that herbivory is generally more intense at lower latitudes, or that plants from low latitudes are generally better defended than are plants from higher latitudes. These results are counter to the prevailing thought on this topic, and suggest that this field may be ripe for the development of new theory.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01814.x
机译:在低纬度地区,包括草食动物,捕食和竞争在内的生物相互作用更加强烈的观点已被广泛接受,并支持了关于生物多样性纬度梯度的几种主流理论。当前的理论还预测,在低纬度地区激烈的生物相互作用将选择植物以更好地防御食草动物。我们回顾了文献,以提供证据支持和反对以下假设的证据:在低纬度,草食性更强,低纬度的植物比高纬度的植物受到更好的保护。在草食性的38个纬度比较中,只有37%在较低的纬度上显示出较高的草食性,并且荟萃分析中的平均效应大小与零没有显着差异。因此,现有数据不支持在热带地区食草通常更为强烈的观点。在56个比较中,只有9个在低纬度地区发现较高的化学防御能力,而荟萃分析显示,总体上,高纬度地区的植物化学防御能力明显更高。该结果与许多文献的预测相反。荟萃分析显示纬度对身体防御没有显着影响。对有关进食试验和普通花园试验的文献的回顾表明,食草动物倾向于偏爱高纬度地区的组织。这种趋势可能源于总体防御能力的差异,而该差异并未被文献中所使用的指标所捕获,但也可能是由于营养质量的差异所致。实证数据并不支持普遍的观点,即低纬度地区的草食性通常更高,或者低纬度地区的植物通常比高纬度地区的植物得到更好的保护。这些结果与关于该主题的主流思想背道而驰,并表明该领域对于新理论的发展可能已经成熟。Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01814。 X

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号