...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology >Efficacy of treatment for patients with achalasia depends on the distensibility of the esophagogastric junction
【24h】

Efficacy of treatment for patients with achalasia depends on the distensibility of the esophagogastric junction

机译:门失弛缓症的治疗效果取决于食管胃交界处的可扩张性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background & Aims: Many patients with persistent dysphagia and regurgitation after therapy have low or no lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. Distensibility of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) largely determines esophageal emptying. We investigated whether assessment of the distensibility of the EGJ is a better and more integrated parameter than LES pressure for determining efficacy of treatment for patients with achalasia. Methods: We measured distensibility of the EGJ using an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP) in 15 healthy volunteers (controls; 8 male; age, 40 ± 4.1 years) and 30 patients with achalasia (16 male; age, 51 ± 3.1 years). Patients were also assessed by esophageal manometry and a timed barium esophagogram. Symptom scores were assessed using the Eckardt score, with a score 4 indicating treatment success. The effect of initial and additional treatment on distensibility and symptoms was evaluated in 7 and 5 patients, respectively. Results: EGJ distensibility was significantly reduced in untreated patients with achalasia compared with controls (0.7 ± 0.9 vs 6.3 ± 0.7 mm 2/mm Hg; P .001). In patients with achalasia, EGJ distensibility correlated with esophageal emptying (r = -0.72; P .01) and symptoms (r = 0.61; P .01) and was significantly increased with treatment. EGJ distensibility was significantly higher in patients successfully treated (Eckardt score 3) compared with those with an Eckardt score 3 (1.6 ± 0.3 vs 4.4 ± 0.5 mm 2/mm Hg; P =.001). Even when LES pressure was low, EGJ distensibility could be reduced, which was associated with impaired emptying and recurrent symptoms. Conclusions: EGJ distensibility is impaired in patients with achalasia and, in contrast to LES pressure, is associated with esophageal emptying and clinical response. Assessment of EGJ distensibility by EndoFLIP is a better parameter than LES pressure for evaluating efficacy of treatment for achalasia.
机译:背景与目的:许多患者在治疗后持续性吞咽困难和反流,其食管括约肌(LES)压力较低或没有。食管胃交界处(EGJ)的可扩张性在很大程度上决定了食管的排空。我们调查了在确定门失弛缓症的疗效方面,评估EGJ的可扩张性是否比LES压力更好,更综合。方法:我们使用内窥镜功能管腔成像探头(EndoFLIP)在15位健康志愿者(对照组; 8位男性;年龄40±4.1岁)和30例门失弛症患者(16位男性;年龄51±3.1岁)中测量了EGJ的可扩张性)。还通过食管测压和定时钡剂食管造影术对患者进行了评估。使用Eckardt评分评估症状评分,评分<4表示治疗成功。分别在7位和5位患者中评估了初始和其他治疗对扩张性和症状的影响。结果:与对照组相比,未经治疗的门失弛缓患者的EGJ扩张性明显降低(0.7±0.9 vs 6.3±0.7 mm 2 / mm Hg; P <.001)。在门失弛缓患者中,EGJ扩张性与食管排空(r = -0.72; P <.01)和症状(r = 0.61; P <.01)相关,并随治疗而显着增加。与Eckardt得分> 3的患者相比,成功治疗的患者(Eckardt得分<3)的EGJ扩张性明显更高(1.6±0.3 vs 4.4±0.5 mm 2 / mm Hg; P = .001)。即使LES压力低,EGJ的扩张性也会降低,这与排空障碍和复发症状有关。结论:门失弛缓患者的EGJ扩张性受损,与LES压力相反,它与食管排空和临床反应有关。通过EndoFLIP评估EGJ的可扩张性是比LES压力更好的参数,用于评估门失弛缓症的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号