首页> 外文期刊>Fisheries Research >Beyond Biological Performance Measures in Management Strategy Evaluation: Bringing in Economics and the Effects of Trawling on the Benthos
【24h】

Beyond Biological Performance Measures in Management Strategy Evaluation: Bringing in Economics and the Effects of Trawling on the Benthos

机译:在管理策略评估中超越生物绩效指标:带来经济学和拖网渔船对底栖生物的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The performance of management strategies for a prawn fishery in northern Australia is evaluated using the management strategy evaluation (MSE) approach. The operating model on which the analyses are based includes population dynamics models for four prawn species and five stocks of each species, an effort allocation model and a benthic impacts model. Management is implemented through controls on the fishing effort that targets the two main target species (Penaeus semisulcatus and Penaeus esculentus) and the technical interactions between the two species are also taken into account. The total effort set by management is distributed to regions and grid cells in each region through effort allocation models. The performance measures used in this study cover conservation of the target species, economic returns and the impact of fishing on benthic communities. Two classes of management strategy are evaluated. One class seeks to move stocks towards the target spawning stock size which is a pre-specified fraction of the spawning stock size at which Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) is achieved using a threshold control rule, while the other class selects time-trajectories of future effort to maximize discounted profit. Management strategies that control effort levels to maximize the total profit over the long-term outperform those which aim to move the spawning stock size toward SMSY in terms of most performance measures. For example, even when the target stock size for the MSY-based management strategy is selected to be the same as that which maximizes profits, selecting effort to maximize profits leads to lower variability in catches and profits. This study illustrates how broader ecosystem considerations can be included in MSE analyses without the need for the development and implementation of full ecosystem models and hence provides a “middle road” between single-species MSEs and full ecosystem MSEs.
机译:使用管理策略评估(MSE)方法对澳大利亚北部对虾渔业管理策略的绩效进行评估。分析所基于的操作模型包括四个对虾物种和每个物种五个种群的种群动态模型,工作量分配模型和底栖影响模型。通过控制针对两个主要目标物种(对虾和对虾)的捕捞努力来实施管理,并且还考虑了这两个物种之间的技术相互作用。管理层设置的总工作量通过工作量分配模型分配到每个区域中的区域和网格单元。本研究中使用的绩效指标涵盖了目标物种的保护,经济收益以及渔业对底栖生物的影响。评估了两类管理策略。一类寻求将种群移动到目标产卵种群规模,该目标是使用阈值控制规则达到最大可持续产量(MSY)的产卵种群规模的预定比例,而另一类则选择未来的时间轨迹努力最大化折现利润。在大多数绩效指标上,控制努力水平以最大程度地提高总利润的管理策略要好于那些旨在使产卵股票规模朝SMSY转移的管理策略。例如,即使选择基于MSY的管理策略的目标库存大小与最大化利润的目标库存大小相同,选择最大化利润的努力也会导致捕获量和利润的可变性降低。这项研究说明了如何在不开发和实施完整的生态系统模型的情况下,将更广泛的生态系统考虑因素纳入MSE分析中,从而为单物种MSE与完整生态系统MSE之间提供了一条“中间道路”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号