首页> 外文期刊>Fisheries Research >A study of optimum positioning of square-mesh escape panels in Irish SeaNephrops trawls
【24h】

A study of optimum positioning of square-mesh escape panels in Irish SeaNephrops trawls

机译:爱尔兰SeaNephrops拖网中方形网状逃生板的最佳定位研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The position of a square-mesh panel in a 70-mm Nephrops trawl of the type widely used in the Irish Sea was varied to examine the effect on catch rates of whiting (Merlangius merlangus) of different sizes. Panels of 75-mm mesh size and 3 m length were positioned either 1 m in front of the cod-end extension, conforming with United Kingdom (UK) legislation, or 7 m in front of the extension, conforming with Irish (IRL) legislation. Forty-three tows of a twin Nephrops trawl were carried out from a commercial fishing vessel of the type using this gear in the Irish Sea, with different panel positions in the two nets. In a subsequent experiment, the twin trawl was separated into two single trawls and 40 parallel hauls were carried out from two smaller commercial trawlers typical of the single-rig Nephrops fleet in the Irish Sea. In each experiment, the trawls were deployed over a range of depths. Rigged as a twin trawl, the IRL net consistently caught fewer whiting below the minimum landing size (MLS) of 27 cm than did the UK net (mean catch rates of 72 +/- 10 and 131 +/- 14 fish per hour, respectively). Catch rates above MLS were almost identical in most hauls. In contrast, the panel position had no significant effect on catch rates of whiting of all sizes when the same nets were towed in parallel by the two smaller vessels. Possible reasons for these differences in results are discussed. As catch rates of whiting above MLS were not affected by panel position in both sets of trials, it is concluded that the more forward panel position would be most appropriate for Nephrops fisheries involving both single and twin trawls.
机译:在爱尔兰海广泛使用的70毫米Nephrops拖网中,一块方网镶板的位置发生了变化,以检查对不同尺寸的白鳕(Merlangius merlangus)捕获率的影响。筛网尺寸为75毫米,长度为3 m的面板放置在鳕鱼末端延伸段的前方1 m(符合英国(UK)法规),或者位于延伸段的前方7 m(符合爱尔兰(IRL)法规) 。在爱尔兰海,使用这种渔具从一艘商业捕鱼船上拖出了43只双头Nephrops拖网拖网,在两个网中的位置不同。在随后的实验中,将双拖网拖网分为两个单拖网网,并从爱尔兰海中典型的单钻Nephrops船队的两个较小的商用拖网拖网进行了40次平行拖运。在每个实验中,拖网都在一定深度范围内展开。作为双拖网,IRL网在低于27厘米的最小着陆尺寸(MLS)的情况下始终捕获的鳕鱼少于英国网(平均每小时捕捞速度分别为72 +/- 10和131 +/- 14条鱼) )。在大多数运输中,高于MLS的捕获率几乎相同。相反,当相同的网被两个较小的容器平行拖曳时,面板位置对所有尺寸的白麦的捕获率没有显着影响。讨论了这些结果差异的可能原因。由于两组试验中白垩纪以上的白垩捕捞率均不受小组位置的影响,因此得出的结论是,对于涉及单拖网和双网拖网的尼非罗普渔业,更向前的小组位置最合适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号