首页> 外文期刊>Fisheries Management and Ecology >The effect of a closed area and beach seine exclusion on coral reef fishcatches
【24h】

The effect of a closed area and beach seine exclusion on coral reef fishcatches

机译:禁区和围网围网对珊瑚礁鱼获捕的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fish landing data from the Mombasa Marine National Park (MNP) and a marine reserve exploited by various gears were studied over a 5-yr period to determine the influence of the closed area and different gears in fisheries. The number fishing and boats per landing site was constant, but total and catch per unit effort progressively declined in all sites on an annual basis irrespective of the existence of a marine reserve, exclusion of the beach seines or use of gear. Differences between landing sites were most pronounced when analysed on a catch per area as opposed to the more standard catch per fisherman, suggesting compensation in human effort when catches decline. A marine reserve next to a closed area that excluded beach seines had the highest catch per area (5.5 kg ha(-1) month(-1)) despite having the highest density of fishermen (0.07 +/- 0.02 fishermen ha(-1) month(-1)). The annual rate of decline in the catch was lower than the other sites at around 250 g day(-1) compared with 310-400 g day(-1) in the other sites. One landing site, which excluded beach seine landings for mure than 20 yrs, had a high catch per area (similar to5.3 kg ha(-1) month(-1)), but after experiencing a doubling in the effort of other gears (line, speargun and trap), the catch per fisherman and area were reduced. Environmental or habitat degradation and excessive effort remain the most likely explanation for the overall declines in catch from 1995 to 1999. Closed areas and beach seine exclusion have the potential to increase catch rates, but the first often reduces the total fishing area and possibly leads to a loss of total catch, at least on a time scale of less than 10 yrs. The exclusion of beach seines can lead to an increase in other gear types that can also cause reductions in catch.
机译:在5年的时间里,研究了蒙巴萨海洋国家公园(MNP)的鱼类着陆数据以及各种渔具开发的海洋保护区,以确定封闭区域和不同渔具对渔业的影响。每个着陆点的捕鱼和船只数量是恒定的,但不管是否有海洋保护区,不包括沙滩围网或使用渔具,所有地点的单位总捕捞量和捕捞量逐年递减。当对每个区域的渔获量进行分析时,着陆点之间的差异最为明显,而不是每个渔民的标准渔获量有所不同,这表明当渔获量下降时,对人类工作的补偿。尽管渔民密度最高(0.07 +/- 0.02渔民公顷(-1),但毗邻禁区的不包括沙滩围网的海洋保护区的渔获量最高(5.5 kg ha(-1)month(-1))。 )month(-1))。渔获量的年下降速度在其他250 g天(-1)左右,低于其他地方的310-400 g day(-1)。一个降落地点,不包括海滩围网降落超过20年的土地,每个区域的捕捞量较高(大约5.3 kg ha(-1)month(-1)),但是在其他渔具的努力下却翻了一番(钓线,鱼枪和陷阱),每个渔民和每个地区的捕捞量都减少了。环境或栖息地的退化以及过度的努力仍然是1995年至1999年渔获量总体下降的最可能原因。禁区和围网围网有可能增加渔获率,但第一个往往会减少总捕鱼面积,并可能至少在不到10年的时间内丧失了总捕捞量。排除海滩围网可能导致其他渔具类型增加,也可能导致渔获量减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号