首页> 外文期刊>Freshwater Reviews >Subsidy or subtraction: how do terrestrial inputs influence consumer production in lakes?
【24h】

Subsidy or subtraction: how do terrestrial inputs influence consumer production in lakes?

机译:补贴或减法:地面投入如何影响湖泊的消费者生产?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Cross-ecosystem fluxes are ubiquitous in food webs and are generally thought of as subsidies to consumer populations. Yet external or allochthonous inputs may in fact have complex and habitat-specific effects on recipient ecosystems. In lakes, terrestrial inputs of organic carbon contribute to basal resource availability, but can also reduce resource availability via shading effects on phytoplankton and periphyton. Terrestrial inputs might therefore either subsidise or subtract from consumer production. We developed and parameterised a simple model to explore this idea. The model estimates basal resource supply and consumer production given lake-level characteristics including total phosphorus (TP) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration, and consumer-level characteristics including resource preferences and growth efficiencies. Terrestrial inputs diminished primary production and total basal resource supply at the whole-lake level, except in ultra-oligo-trophic systems. However, this system-level generalisation masked complex habitat-specific effects. In the pelagic zone, dissolved and particulate terrestrial carbon inputs were available to zooplankton via several food web pathways. Consequently, zooplankton production usually increased with terrestrial inputs, even as total whole-lake resource availability decreased. In contrast, in the benthic zone the dominant, dissolved portion of the terrestrial carbon load had predominantly negative effects on resource availability via shading of periphyton. Consequently, terrestrial inputs always decreased zoobenthic production except under extreme and unrealistic parameterisations of the model. Appreciating the complex and habitat-specific effects of allochthonous inputs may be essential for resolving the effects of cross-habitat fluxes on consumers in lakes and other food webs.
机译:跨生态系统通量在食物网中无处不在,通常被认为是对消费人群的补贴。然而,外部或异源输入实际上可能会对接收者的生态系统产生复杂且特定于栖息地的影响。在湖泊中,陆地有机碳的输入有助于基础资源的可利用性,但也会通过对浮游植物和周围植物的遮蔽作用而降低资源的可利用性。因此,地面投入可能会补贴或减少消费者的生产。我们开发并参数化了一个简单的模型来探索这一想法。该模型根据湖泊水平的特征(包括总磷(TP)和溶解的有机碳(DOC)的浓度)以及消费者水平的特征(包括资源的偏好和增长效率)来估算基础资源的供应和消费者的生产。除超寡营养系统外,地面投入减少了整个湖面的初级生产和基础资源总量。但是,这种系统级别的概括掩盖了特定于栖息地的复杂影响。在中上层带,通过几种食物网途径可为浮游动物提供溶解的和颗粒状的陆地碳输入。因此,即使全湖资源总量减少,浮游动物的产量也通常随着地面投入的增加而增加。相反,在底栖带,陆地碳负荷的主要溶解部分主要通过底生植物的遮蔽对资源的利用产生负面影响。因此,除了在模型的极端和不现实的参数设置下,地面输入总是会减少动物的底栖动物生产。对于解决跨栖息地通量对湖泊和其他食物网中消费者的影响而言,了解异源投入物的复杂和特定于生境的影响可能至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号