首页> 外文期刊>Freshwater Biology >What predicts the use by brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) of terrestrial invertebrate subsidies in headwater streams?
【24h】

What predicts the use by brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) of terrestrial invertebrate subsidies in headwater streams?

机译:怎样预测溪鳟(Salvelinus fontinalis)在源头水流中使用陆生无脊椎动物补贴?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1. Spatial subsidies are important resources for organisms in receiving habitats, particularly when production in those habitats is low. Terrestrial invertebrates provide a critical subsidy for trout, including eastern brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), but we have limited understanding of what causes input and use of these subsidies to vary among streams. 2. We predicted that forest successional stage would be an especially important driver of variation in terrestrial invertebrate subsidies to brook trout in headwater streams due to differences in terrestrial invertebrate biomass in early and late successional habitats. Specifically, we expected biomass of aerial invertebrates, those capable of dispersal to the stream, to be greater in early successional habitat than late successional habitat due to the nutrient-rich, herbaceous vegetation typical of early successional habitat. 3. We measured aerial terrestrial invertebrate biomass in early and late successional habitats, input to streams and use by resident brook trout in 12 first- and second-order catchments in northern New Hampshire, U.S.A. The study catchments represented a range of early successional habitat coverage (0-51.5%). We also measured a suite of reach-scale variables that might influence terrestrial invertebrate input and use by brook trout, including riparian forest conditions and benthic invertebrate biomass. 4. Within study catchments, aerial terrestrial invertebrate biomass and abundance were significantly higher in early successional habitats than late successional habitats. However, terrestrial invertebrate input to streams and use by brook trout were unrelated to per cent early successional habitat in the catchment, and to other catchment and riparian forest characteristics. These results indicate that the management for upland early successional habitat has little effect on terrestrial invertebrate subsidies to headwater streams and fish. 5. Surprisingly, benthic invertebrate biomass was the one significant predictor of per cent terrestrial invertebrates in brook trout diets. Use of terrestrial invertebrate subsidies declined with increasing benthic invertebrate biomass, suggesting that productivity in the aquatic environment influences the degree to which brook trout use terrestrial subsidies. Although subsidy inputs are controlled by the donor system, this study shows that use of these subsidies by consumers can be determined by conditions in the recipient habitat.
机译:1.空间补贴是生物在接收生境中的重要资源,特别是当这些生境的产量较低时。陆生无脊椎动物为鳟鱼,包括东部溪鳟(Salvelinus fontinalis)提供了重要的补贴,但是我们对什么导致输入和使用这些补贴在溪流之间变化的了解有限。 2.我们预测,由于演替生境早期和后期的陆生无脊椎动物生物量存在差异,森林演替阶段将成为水源地溪流鳟鱼陆生无脊椎动物补贴变化的一个特别重要的驱动因素。具体而言,由于早期演替生境中典型的营养丰富,草本植物,我们期望空中无脊椎动物的生物量(能够扩散到河流中)比早期演替生境中的生物量更大。 3.我们在美国新罕布什尔州北部的12个一阶和二阶流域测量了早期和晚期演替生境中空中陆生无脊椎动物的生物量,河水的输入量和常驻河鳟的使用。研究流域代表了早期演替生境的覆盖范围(0-51.5%)。我们还测量了一系列可能影响陆生无脊椎动物输入和溪鳟使用的触角尺度变量,包括河岸森林条件和底栖无脊椎动物生物量。 4.在研究流域内,演替初期的生境中陆地陆生无脊椎动物的生物量和丰度明显高于演替后期的生境。但是,陆生无脊椎动物对溪流的输入和溪鳟的利用与该流域早期演替生境的百分比以及其他流域和河岸森林特征无关。这些结果表明,高地早期演替生境的管理对陆生无脊椎动物对源头水流和鱼类的补贴影响很小。 5.令人惊讶的是,底栖无脊椎动物的生物量是溪鳟饮食中陆生无脊椎动物百分比的重要预测指标。陆栖无脊椎动物补贴的使用随着底栖无脊椎动物生物量的增加而减少,这表明水生环境中的生产力影响小鳟鱼使用陆上补贴的程度。尽管补贴的投入受捐赠者系统的控制,但这项研究表明,消费者对补贴的使用方式可以由受赠者栖息地的条件决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号