...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Comparison of tramadol and morphine via subcutaneous PCA following major orthopaedic surgery.
【24h】

Comparison of tramadol and morphine via subcutaneous PCA following major orthopaedic surgery.

机译:大型骨科手术后通过皮下PCA比较曲马多和吗啡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare subcutaneous PCA tramadol with subcutaneous PCA morphine for postoperative pain relief after major orthopaedic surgery and for the incidence of side-effects. METHODS: In a double-blind randomised controlled study 40 patients (20 in each group) self-administered either tramadol or morphine for 72 hr after surgery via s.c. PCA. The following variables were recorded at various time intervals: (i) pain score by means of a visual analogue scale, (ii) drug consumption and total PCA demands, (iii) vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate), (iv) oxygen saturation and respiratory rate, and (v) side-effects (sedation, nausea/vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention and constipation). RESULTS: Both drugs provided effective analgesia. The mean consumption in the first 24 hr was 792 +/- 90 mg tramadol and 42 +/- 4 mg morphine. Thereafter, consumption of both drugs declined markedly. Moderate haemodynamic changes were observed in both the tramadol and morphine groups (with a maximum 20% decrease in mean blood pressure and a maximum 17% increase in heart rate) during the 72 hr period. Both tramadol and morphine were associated with a clinically and statistically significant (P < 0.001) decrease in oxygen saturation, but without changes in respiratory rates. Desaturation was less marked with tramadol. Tramadol appeared to cause more nausea and vomiting than morphine. Sedation was mild and only seen during the first few hours after surgery in both groups. CONCLUSION: Tramadol is an effective analgesic agent for the relief of acute postoperative pain when administered by PCA via the subcutaneous route. Under these conditions tramadol behaves much like morphine with a similar side-effect profile.
机译:目的:比较皮下PCA曲马多和皮下PCA吗啡在大骨外科手术后的术后疼痛缓解和副作用的发生率。方法:在一项双盲随机对照研究中,40例患者(每组20例)在手术后通过s.c.自行给予曲马多或吗啡治疗72小时。 PCA。在不同的时间间隔记录以下变量:(i)通过视觉模拟量表进行疼痛评分,(ii)药物消耗和PCA总需求量,(iii)生命体征(血压和心率),(iv)氧气饱和度和呼吸频率,以及(v)副作用(镇静,恶心/呕吐,瘙痒,尿retention留和便秘)。结果:两种药物均提供有效的镇痛作用。前24小时的平均消费量为792 +/- 90毫克曲马多和42 +/- 4毫克吗啡。此后,两种药物的消费量均显着下降。在72小时内,在曲马多和吗啡组中均观察到中等的血液动力学变化(平均血压最高降低20%,心率最高提高17%)。曲马多和吗啡均与氧饱和度的临床和统计学显着性降低(P <0.001)有关,但呼吸频率没有变化。曲马多对去饱和作用的影响较小。曲马多似乎比吗啡引起更多的恶心和呕吐。两组镇静作用均较轻,仅在手术后的最初几个小时内见到。结论:曲马多是一种有效的镇痛药,可通过皮下注射PCA来减轻急性术后疼痛。在这些条件下,曲马多的行为类似于吗啡,具有相似的副作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号