首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecology and Management >Tamm Review: Light use efficiency and carbon storage in nutrient and water experiments on major forest plantation species
【24h】

Tamm Review: Light use efficiency and carbon storage in nutrient and water experiments on major forest plantation species

机译:Tamm评论:主要人工林物种的养分和水分实验中的光利用效率和碳储存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We used published data from nine sites where nutrient and water optimization studies had been installed in a 2 x 2 factorial design to determine maximum biomass production in response to a simple set of treatments. We tested for site and treatment effects on the relationships between stem, above-ground (stem, branches, foliage) and total (aboveground + roots) biomass production versus intercepted light (light use efficiency, LUE). We also estimated the additional carbon stored as a result of treatment. The sites were located in Australia (Pinus radiata), Brazil (Eucalyptus grandis x urophylla), France (Pinus pinaster), the United States in Georgia and North Carolina (Pinus taeda) and Hawaii (Eucalyptus saligna), Portugal (Eucalyptus globulus), South Africa (E. grandis), and Sweden (Picea abies). We hypothesized that site, treatment and their interaction would significantly affect LUE; however, we rejected our hypothesis because stem, aboveground and total LUE were not affected by site or treatment. The stem, aboveground and total LUE values were 1.21, 1.51, and 0.85 g MJ(-1), respectively. The total LUE value was lower than that for stem and aboveground LUE because a different population was used for the analysis (only five of the nine sites had total production data), and the total LUE relationship had a zero intercept whereas the stem and aboveground LUE relationships had a negative intercept. The average amount of additional carbon that would be stored by the irrigation, fertilization, and fertilization plus irrigation treatments was 3.9, 6.8 and 13.4 Mg CO2 equivalents ha(-1) yr(-1), respectively. These additional carbon storage estimates, based on these research studies with annual nutrient and water applications, were similar to results obtained in operational settings with less intensive nutrient applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们使用了来自9个站点的公开数据,这些站点已在2 x 2因子设计中安装了营养和水的优化研究,以确定对一组简单处理的最大生物量生产。我们测试了茎,地上(茎,枝,叶)和总(地上+根)生物量产量与拦截光(光利用效率,LUE)之间关系的位置和处理效果。我们还估计了由于处理而存储的额外碳。这些地点位于澳大利亚(Pinus radiata),巴西(Eucalyptus grandis x urophylla),法国(Pinus pinaster),美国在乔治亚州和北卡罗来纳州(Pinus taeda)和夏威夷(Eucalyptus saligna),葡萄牙(Eucalyptus globulus),南非(E. grandis)和瑞典(Picea abies)。我们假设该部位,治疗及其相互作用将显着影响LUE。但是,我们拒绝了这一假设,因为茎,地上和总LUE不受场地或处理的影响。茎,地上和总LUE值分别为1.21、1.51和0.85 g MJ(-1)。总的LUE值低于茎和地上LUE的值,因为分析使用了不同的种群(九个站点中只有五个具有总产量数据),并且总LUE关系的截距为零,而茎和地上LUE的截距为零。人际关系受到负面影响。通过灌溉,施肥和施肥再加上灌溉处理,平均可存储的额外碳量分别为3.9、6.8和13.4 Mg CO2当量ha(-1)yr(-1)。根据这些对年度养分和水的应用的研究得出的这些额外的碳储量估算值,与养分密集度较低的运行环境中的结果相似。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号