首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecology and Management >Ecological forestry in an uneven-aged, late-successional forest: simulated effects of contrasting treatments on structure and yield.
【24h】

Ecological forestry in an uneven-aged, late-successional forest: simulated effects of contrasting treatments on structure and yield.

机译:年龄不均衡,后期成功的森林中的生态林业:对比处理对结构和产量的模拟影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ecological forestry practices are designed to retain species and structural features important for maintaining ecosystem function but which may be deficient in conventionally managed stands. We used the spatially-explicit, individual tree model CANOPY to assess tradeoffs in enhanced ecological attributes vs. reductions in timber yield for a wide variety of treatments in uneven-aged, late-successional northern hardwood forests. Treatments included various combinations of (1) larger retained maximum tree diameters in the post-harvest stand, (2) permanently reserved legacy trees, (3) variable opening sizes, (4) coarse woody debris retention, (5) species harvest restrictions, and (6) occasional moderate-intensity harvests with larger openings ('irregular multi-cohort harvests'). Compared to conventional single-tree selection, reduction in simulated harvest yields varied widely from a 9% decline with 7 reserve trees/ha to a 55% reduction in treatments that retained coarse woody debris along with a maximum residual live-tree diameter of 80 cm. Despite the dominance by shade-tolerant species, simulated declines were similar in magnitude to those predicted or observed for relatively shade-intolerant conifers of the Pacific Northwest. Treatments that protected 'sensitive' species from harvest or raised the maximum residual diameter to 80 cm appeared to have the best balance between fostering ecological values of old-growth forests and moderating the impact on timber yield. These treatments produced stands meeting minimum structural criteria of old-growth forests while causing harvest declines of 27-30% compared to conventional single-tree selection. Coarse woody debris volumes were similar to those produced by the reserve-tree treatments, but the species-protection and 80 cm treatments had higher densities of large trees, and there was less reduction in yield for each large tree retained in the residual stand. Most other treatments maintained mature forest structure or stands that vacillated between mature and borderline old-growth conditions.
机译:生态林业实践旨在保留对维持生态系统功能重要但在常规管理林分中可能不足的物种和结构特征。我们使用空间明确的单树模型CANOPY评估了在年龄不均,后期成功的北方硬木森林中进行的各种处理在增强的生态属性与木材产量减少之间的权衡。处理包括以下各种组合:(1)采伐后林分中保留的最大树木最大直径更大;(2)永久保留的老树;(3)开口尺寸可变;(4)粗木屑保留;(5)物种采伐限制; (6)偶尔有中等强度的收获,且开口较大(“多族不规则收获”)。与传统的单棵树相比,模拟收获量的减少幅度很大,从每公顷7棵备用树下降9%到保留粗木屑和最大残留活树直径为80厘米的处理减少55%。 。尽管耐荫树种占主导地位,模拟的下降幅度与西北太平洋相对不耐荫的针叶树的预测或观察到的相似。保护“敏感”物种免于采伐或将最大残留直径提高到80厘米的处理方法似乎在提高旧林的生态价值和减轻对木材产量的影响之间达到了最佳平衡。这些处理所产生的林分符合旧林的最低结构标准,但与传统的单棵树相比,导致收成下降27-30%。粗大的木屑量与储备树处理产生的体积相似,但是物种保护和80 cm处理的大树密度更高,残留在林分中的每棵大树的减产幅度都较小。大多数其他处理方法可维持成熟的森林结构或在成熟和边缘性的旧生条件之间摇摆不定的林分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号