首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Conservation >Livelihood gains and ecological costs of non-timber forest product dependence: assessing the roles of dependence, ecological knowledge and market structure in three contrasting human and ecological settings in south India.
【24h】

Livelihood gains and ecological costs of non-timber forest product dependence: assessing the roles of dependence, ecological knowledge and market structure in three contrasting human and ecological settings in south India.

机译:非木材林产品依赖的生计收益和生态成本:评估依赖,生态知识和市场结构在印度南部三个相反的人类和生态环境中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) constitute the single largest determinant of livelihoods for scores of forest fringe communities and poor people in the tropics. In India over 50 million people are believed to be directly dependent upon NTFPs for their subsistence. However, such human dependence on NTFPs for livelihood gains (win) has most frequently been at a certain ecological cost (lose). If livelihoods are to be maintained, the existing 'win-lose' settings have to be steered to a 'win-win' mode, otherwise, there could be severe erosion of the biological resources and loss of livelihoods ('lose-lose'). Examining the dependence of forest fringe communities on NTFPs at three sites in south India with contrasting human and ecological settings, three key factors (extent of dependence on NTFPs, indigenous ecological knowledge and market organization) are likely to constrain reaching the win-win situation. How these factors shape the ecological cost of harvesting NTFPs at the three sites is examined. Within the parameter space of these factors, it is possible to predict outcomes and associations that will conform to win-win or win-lose situations. Empirical data derived from the three study sites demonstrate the causality of the observed associations. The key for long-term livelihood gains lies in reducing the ecological cost. Certain interventions and recommendations that could optimize the balance between livelihood gains and ecological cost are proposed.
机译:非木材林产品(NTFPs)是热带边缘地区数十个森林边缘社区和贫困人口生计的唯一最大决定因素。在印度,据信超过5000万人的生活直接依赖于NTFP。但是,这种人类对NTFPs谋生(胜利)的依赖最常见的是付出了一定的生态代价(失败)。如果要维持生计,则必须将现有的“双输”设置引导至“双赢”模式,否则,生物资源可能会受到严重侵蚀并丧失生计(“输双输”) 。考察印度南部三个地点的森林边缘群落对NTFP的依赖性,并与人类和生态环境形成对比,三个关键因素(对NTFP的依赖性,本地生态知识和市场组织的程度)可能会限制达到双赢的局面。研究了这些因素如何影响在这三个地点收获NTFP的生态成本。在这些因素的参数空间内,可以预测符合双赢或双输局面的结果和关联。来自三个研究地点的经验数据证明了所观察到的关联具有因果关系。长期谋生的关键在于降低生态成本。提出了一些干预措施和建议,可以优化生计收益与生态成本之间的平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号