首页> 外文期刊>Forest Policy and Economics >Historical development of institutional arrangements for forest monitoring and REDD plus MRV in Peru: Discursive-institutionalist perspectives
【24h】

Historical development of institutional arrangements for forest monitoring and REDD plus MRV in Peru: Discursive-institutionalist perspectives

机译:秘鲁森林监测和REDD + MRV制度安排的历史发展:话语制度主义观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The goal of reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and the roles of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries (REDD +) under UNFCCC has triggered a new discussion on forest resource assessments in these countries. The international process on measurement, reporting and verification of REDD+ outcomes (REDD+ MRV) expands the scope of forest inventories to include quantification of forest carbon stocks and their changes for results-based REDD + payments. UNFCCC decisions also specify methods to be used, and actors to be involved. Although forest management in developing countries has clearly been influenced by international processes in the past, exactly how and to what extent REDD + MRV has affected institutional arrangements for forest assessments in developing countries remains unknown. Using as a theoretical framework Discursive-Institutionalism, a concept derived from political science, this paper examines (1) the historical evolution of institutional arrangements for forest inventories in Peru; and (2) how and to what extent their development has been shaped by international processes on forests, and, more recently, specifically by REDD+ MRV. The findings show that the international REDD + MRV discussion has expanded the objectives of forest assessments in Peru, inspired the mobilization of new actors and resources, and spawned the development of new protocols for forest assessments. However, the 'depth' of these changes is not yet extensive, since the new rules for forest inventories have not yet been formally adopted, and the institutes envisaged to implement forest inventories, including measurement of carbon stocks and their changes, have not been established. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在《气候公约》之下,减少森林砍伐和森林退化造成的排放以及保护,可持续森林管理和增加森林碳储量(REDD +)的作用的目标引发了关于这些国家森林资源评估的新讨论。衡量,报告和核实REDD +成果的国际过程(REDD + MRV)扩大了森林清单的范围,包括对森林碳储量及其以结果为基础的REDD +付款的变化进行量化。 《联合国气候变化框架公约》的决定还规定了使用的方法和参与的行为者。尽管过去发展中国家的森林管理显然已受到国际程序的影响,但REDD + MRV对发展中国家的森林评估机构安排的影响方式和程度尚不清楚。本文采用从政治学衍生而来的Discussive-Institutionalism作为一种理论框架,研究了以下方面:(1)秘鲁森林资源清单制度安排的历史演变; (2)国际森林进程,以及最近,特别是REDD + MRV,如何以及在何种程度上影响了它们的发展。调查结果表明,国际REDD + MRV讨论扩大了秘鲁森林评估的目标,激发了新的参与者和资源的动员,并催生了森林评估新协议的制定。但是,这些变化的“深度”尚未广泛,因为尚未正式采用关于森林清单的新规则,并且尚未建立计划实施森林清单的机构,包括测量碳储量及其变化。 。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号