...
首页> 外文期刊>Forest Products Journal >A Productivity and Cost Comparison of Two Systems for Producing Biomass Fuel from Roadside Forest Treatment Residues
【24h】

A Productivity and Cost Comparison of Two Systems for Producing Biomass Fuel from Roadside Forest Treatment Residues

机译:两种从路边森林处理残渣生产生物质燃料的系统的生产率和成本比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Forest operations generate large quantities of forest biomass residues that can be used for production of bioenergy and bioproducts. However, a significant portion of recoverable residues are inaccessible to large chip vans, making use financially infeasible. New production systems must be developed to increase productivity and reduce costs to facilitate use of these materials. We present a comparison of two alternative systems to produce biomass fuel (i.e., "hog fuel") from forest residues that areinaccessible to chip vans: (1) forwarding residues in fifth-wheel end-dump trailers to a concentration yard, where they can be stored and then ground directly into chip vans, and (2) grinding residues on the treatment unit and forwarding the hog fuel inhigh-sided dump trucks to a concentration yard, where it can be stored and then reloaded into chip vans using a front-end loader. To quantify the productivity and costs of these systems, work study data were collected for both systems on the same treatment unit in northern Idaho in July 2009. With standard machine rate calculations, the observed costs from roadside to loaded chip van were $23.62 per bone dry ton (BDT) for slash forwarding and $24.52 BDT1 for in-woods grinding. Results indicate that forharvest units with conditions similar to the test area, slash forwarding is most appropriate for sites with dispersed residues and long-distance in-woods grinder mobilization. For sites with densely piled roadside residues, in-wood grinding is likely tobe a more productive and less costly option for residue recovery.
机译:森林作业会产生大量森林生物质残留物,可用于生产生物能源和生物产品。但是,大型切屑面包车无法接近大部分可回收残留物,因此在经济上不可行。必须开发新的生产系统以提高生产率并降低成本,以利于使用这些材料。我们对两种替代系统进行比较,这些系统从碎木货车无法到达的森林残留物中生产生物质燃料(即“猪燃料”):( 1)将残留物在第五轮尾卸式拖车中转移到集中堆场,在那里他们可以(2)在处理单元上研磨残留物,并将生猪燃料在高边翻斗车中运送到一个集中场,在那里可以将其存储起来,然后使用前面板将其重新装载到切屑车中末端装载机。为了量化这些系统的生产率和成本,2009年7月在爱达荷州北部的同一处理单元上收集了这两个系统的工作研究数据。使用标准的机器费率计算,从路边到装满碎屑的面包车的观察到的成本为每骨干23.62美元。吨(BDT)用于斜线前进,BDT1 $ 24.52用于室内磨木。结果表明,对于条件类似于测试区域的收获单位,斜线转发最适合于残留物分散且具有远距离林内磨床移动性的地点。对于路边残留物密集堆积的场地,木屑研磨可能是残留物回收的一种生产效率更高且成本更低的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号