...
首页> 外文期刊>Foot and ankle international >Biomechanical evaluation of two clinical tests for plantar heel pain: the dorsiflexion-eversion test for tarsal tunnel syndrome and the windlass test for plantar fasciitis.
【24h】

Biomechanical evaluation of two clinical tests for plantar heel pain: the dorsiflexion-eversion test for tarsal tunnel syndrome and the windlass test for plantar fasciitis.

机译:两种足底跟痛临床测试的生物力学评估:骨隧道综合征的背屈-外翻测试和足底筋膜炎的绞盘测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Plantar heel pain may result from several conditions such as tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) and plantar fasciitis. The dorsiflexion-eversion test is used to diagnose TTS, whereas the windlass test is used for plantar fasciitis. Given the similarity between both tests, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether these tests are able to selectively load the structures which they aim to examine. METHODS: Both tests were evaluated in six cadavers by measuring strain in the plantar fascia, tibial nerve, lateral plantar nerve (LPN), and medial plantar nerve (MPN) using miniature displacement transducers. Longitudinal excursion of the nerves was measured with a digital caliper. RESULTS: With the dorsiflexion-eversion test, dorsiflexion and eversion of the ankle in combination with extension of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints significantly increased strain in the tibial nerve (+1.1%), LPN (+2.2%), and MPN (+3.3%) but also in the plantar fascia (+1.2%) (all: p=0.016). Both components (dorsiflexion-eversion and MTP extension) resulted in significant increases. With the windlass test, extension of all MTP joints significantly increased strain in the plantar fascia (+0.4%, p=0.016), but also in the tibial nerve (+0.4%, p=0.016), LPN (+0.8%, p=0.032) and MPN (+2.0%, p=0.016). Excursion of the nerves was always in the distal direction but only reached significance for the tibial nerve (6.9 mm, p=0.016) and LPN (2.2 mm, p=0.032) during the dorsiflexion-eversion test. CONCLUSIONS: Both tests mechanically challenge various structures that have been associated with plantar heel pain. This questions the usefulness of the tests in the differential diagnosis of plantar heel pain.
机译:背景:足底后跟痛可能是由conditions骨隧道综合征(TTS)和足底筋膜炎等多种情况引起的。背屈-外翻测试用于诊断TTS,而卷扬机测试用于足底筋膜炎。考虑到两个测试之间的相似性,本研究的目的是评估这些测试是否能够选择性地加载要检查的结构。方法:通过使用微型位移传感器测量足底筋膜,胫神经,足底外侧神经(LPN)和足底内侧神经(MPN)的应变,在六个尸体中对这两种测试进行了评估。用数字卡尺测量神经的纵向偏移。结果:通过背屈-外翻测试,踝关节的背屈和外翻以及the趾(MTP)关节的伸展显着增加了胫骨神经的应变(+1.1%),LPN(+ 2.2%)和MPN(+ 3.3%),也可以在足底筋膜中(+1.2%)(全部:p = 0.016)。这两个组成部分(背屈外翻和MTP扩展)均导致显着增加。通过锚机测试,所有MTP关节的伸展都显着增加了足底筋膜的应变(+ 0.4%,p = 0.016),而且胫骨神经的应变(+ 0.4%,p = 0.016),LPN(+ 0.8%,p = 0.032)和MPN(+ 2.0%,p = 0.016)。在背屈-外翻测试中,神经始终向远端偏移,但仅对胫神经(6.9 mm,p = 0.016)和LPN(2.2 mm,p = 0.032)有意义。结论:这两种测试均对与足底跟痛相关的各种结构产生了机械挑战。这质疑了这些测试在足底足跟痛鉴别诊断中的有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号