首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >Drug recognition expert evaluations made using limited data.
【24h】

Drug recognition expert evaluations made using limited data.

机译:使用有限的数据进行的药物识别专家评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Drug Evaluation Classification (DEC) Program is used by Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) officers to determine whether a suspect is under the influence of a drug or drugs at the time of arrest, and, if so, what category of drug(s). The goal of this project was to investigate the relative importance of face-to-face interactions with the suspect, physical evidence (drugs or paraphernalia found), and confessions/statements made by the suspect (or others) in making these determinations.Seventy records of DRE evaluations were selected from a database containing information from all evaluations conducted in Oregon between 1996 and 1998. Each of the 70 records represented a suspect who had either taken a drug from one of four categories (CNS depressant, CNS stimulant, narcotic analgesic, or cannabis) or who had not taken a drug. To be included, the original DRE evaluation and the subsequent toxicology analysis had to agree that the suspect was under the influence of a drug from one of the four categories or not under the influence of a drug.Records from the 70 cases were submitted in written form to 18 Oregon DREs with statements made by suspects or arresting officers, confessions, toxicology results, and descriptions of drugs or paraphernalia found on the suspect omitted. Based only on the written reports of direct observations, and with physiological and psychophysical test results, the DREs attempted to determine whether each of the 70 suspects was under the influence of a drug or drugs, and, if so, what category of drug(s).If the officers determined that a suspect was under the influence of a drug, their accuracy in specifying the drug category was 81% for cannabis, 94% for narcotic analgesics, 78% for CNS stimulants, and 69% for CNS depressants. Overall accuracy in recognizing drug intoxication was 95%. These percentages indicate that although face-to-face interactions, physical evidence, and confessions/statements can be useful adjuncts to DRE decision-making, the majority of drug category decisions can be made solely on the basis of recorded suspect observations and DRE evaluation results.
机译:药品识别专家(DRE)官员使用药品评估分类(DEC)程序来确定嫌疑人在逮捕时是否受到一种或多种药物的影响,如果是,则确定什么种类的药物。该项目的目的是调查与犯罪嫌疑人面对面互动的相对重要性,实物证据(发现毒品或用具)以及犯罪嫌疑人(或其他人)做出这些决定时的供词/陈述。从数据库中选择了DRE评估的一部分,该数据库包含1996年至1998年在俄勒冈州进行的所有评估的信息。70条记录中的每条都代表犯罪嫌疑人,该犯罪嫌疑人服用了以下四类药物之一:中枢神经系统抑制药,中枢神经系统兴奋剂,麻醉性镇痛药,或大麻)或未吸毒的人。包括在内,原始DRE评估和随后的毒理学分析必须同意嫌疑人受四种类别之一的药物影响或不受药物影响.70例病例的记录以书面形式提交送达俄勒冈州18个DRE的表格,其中包括嫌疑人或逮捕人员的陈述,供词,毒理学结果以及对嫌疑人发现的毒品或用具的描述。仅基于直接观察的书面报告以及生理和心理物理测试结果,DRE试图确定70名嫌疑人中的每一个是否受到一种或多种药物的影响,如果是,则确定哪种药物属于)。如果警官确定嫌疑犯受到药物的影响,他们在指定药物类别方面的准确性为大麻81%,麻醉止痛药94%,中枢神经系统兴奋剂78%和中枢神经系统抑制剂69%。识别药物中毒的总体准确性为95%。这些百分比表明,尽管面对面的互动,物理证据和供词/陈述可能是DRE决策的有用辅助手段,但是大多数药物类别决策只能基于记录的可疑观察和DRE评估结果来做出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号