...
首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >A report of the 1997, 1998 and 1999 Paternity Testing Workshops of the English Speaking Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Genetics.
【24h】

A report of the 1997, 1998 and 1999 Paternity Testing Workshops of the English Speaking Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Genetics.

机译:国际法医遗传学会英语工作组1997年,1998年和1999年的亲子鉴定研讨会的报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We present the results of the 1997, 1998 and 1999 Paternity Testing Workshops of the English Speaking Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Genetics. The numbers of participating laboratories were 24 (1997), 31 (1998) and 32 (1999). In 1997, all laboratories drew the correct conclusion that the alleged father was the biological father of the child. In 1998, the alleged father was the biological brother of the child and all laboratories excluded him. The scenario in 1999 was a deficiency case consisting of mother, child and the parents of the alleged father and all but one laboratory drew the correct conclusion.The percentage of laboratories routinely performing variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) investigations using single locus probes (SLPs) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) decreased from 83% in 1997 to 66% in 1999. In the three workshops, more than 90% of the laboratories used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based systems. In 1999, 80% of the laboratories performing PCR, used commercially available short tandem repeat (STR) kits. Other commonly used systems were HLA and PolyMarker investigated with PCR. Conventional systems and RFLP investigations of VNTRs with multi loci probes (MLPs) were used routinely by approximately 20% of the participating laboratories.All laboratories submitting results in the three workshops used RFLP-based VNTRs or/and PCR based VNTRs/STRs. Inter-laboratory comparisons of the results showed a very high concordance. The overall coefficients of variation between the laboratories of the results of RFLP typing of the commonly used VNTRs D2S44, D7S21, D7S22 and D12S11 were 1.2-1.3%. Consistent results were obtained in the great majority of the systems investigated by PCR and typing errors counted for less than 0.3% of the PCR based results.
机译:我们介绍了国际法医遗传学会英语工作组1997年,1998年和1999年的亲子鉴定工作坊的结果。参与实验室的数量为24个(1997年),31个(1998年)和32个(1999年)。 1997年,所有实验室得出了正确的结论,即所谓的父亲是孩子的亲生父亲。 1998年,据称父亲是孩子的亲生兄弟,所有实验室都将他排除在外。 1999年发生的情况是一个由母亲,儿童和所谓父亲的父母组成的缺乏案例,除一个实验室外,所有实验室都得出了正确的结论。实验室使用单基因座探针常规进行可变数目的串联重复(VNTR)研究的百分比( SLPs和限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)从1997年的83%下降到1999年的66%。在这三个讲习班中,超过90%的实验室使用了基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的系统。在1999年,进行PCR的实验室中有80%使用了市售的短串联重复序列(STR)试剂盒。其他常用的系统是通过PCR研究的HLA和PolyMarker。大约有20%的参与实验室常规使用常规的系统和带有多基因座探针(MLP)的VNTR进行RFLP研究。在三个研讨会上提交结果的所有实验室均使用基于RFLP的VNTR或/和基于PCR的VNTR / STR。实验室之间的结果比较显示出很高的一致性。常用VNTR D2S44,D7S21,D7S22和D12S11的RFLP分型结果在实验室之间的总变异系数为1.2-1.3%。在通过PCR研究的大多数系统中都获得了一致的结果,而打字错误所占的比例不到基于PCR的结果的0.3%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号