...
首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >Skeletal age estimation for forensic purposes: A comparison of GP, TW2 and TW3 methods on an Italian sample
【24h】

Skeletal age estimation for forensic purposes: A comparison of GP, TW2 and TW3 methods on an Italian sample

机译:用于法医目的的骨骼年龄估计:在意大利样本中比较GP,TW2和TW3方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Paediatricians, radiologists, anthropologists and medico-legal specialists are often called as experts in order to provide age estimation (AE) for forensic purposes. The literature recommends performing the X-rays of the left hand and wrist (HW-XR) for skeletal age estimation. The method most frequently employed is the Greulich and Pyle (GP) method. In addition, the so-called bone-specific techniques are also applied including the method of Tanner Whitehouse (TW) in the latest versions TW2 and TVV3. Aim: To compare skeletal age and chronological age in a large sample of children and adolescents using GP, TW2 and TW3 methods in order to establish which of these is the most reliable for forensic purposes. Material and methods: The sample consisted of 307 HW-XRs of Italian children or adolescents, 145 females and 162 males aged between 6 and 20 years. The radiographies were scored according to the GP, TW2RUS and TW3RUS methods by one investigator. The results' reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Student t-test were performed to search for significant differences between skeletal and chronological ages. Results: The distributions of the differences between estimated and chronological age, by means of boxplots, show how median differences for TW3 and GP methods are generally very close to 0. Hypothesis tests' results were obtained, with respect to the sex, both for the entire group of individuals and people grouped by age. Results show no significant differences among estimated and chronological age for TW3 and, to a lesser extent, GP. The TW2 proved to be the worst of the three methods. Conclusions: Our results support the conclusion that the TW2 method is not reliable for AE for forensic purpose. The GP and TW3 methods have proved to be reliable in males. For females, the best method was found to be TW3. When performing forensic age estimation in subjects around 14 years of age, it could be advisable to use and associate the TW3 and GP methods.
机译:背景:儿科医生,放射科医生,人类学家和法医学专家通常被称为专家,以提供法医目的年龄估计(AE)。文献建议对左手和手腕进行X射线检查(HW-XR)以估计骨骼年龄。最常用的方法是Greulich和Pyle(GP)方法。此外,还应用了所谓的骨骼特定技术,包括最新版本TW2和TVV3中的Tanner Whitehouse(TW)方法。目的:使用GP,TW2和TW3方法比较大量儿童和青少年样本中的骨骼年龄和年代年龄,以便确定其中哪一种是最可靠的法医用途。材料和方法:样本由307名意大利儿童或青少年的HW-XR,145名女性和162名男性组成,年龄在6至20岁之间。一名研究人员根据GP,TW2RUS和TW3RUS方法对射线照相进行评分。使用组内相关系数评估结果的可靠性。进行Wilcoxon秩和检验和St​​udent t检验以寻找骨骼年龄和年代之间的显着差异。结果:通过箱线图,估计年龄和按时间顺序的年龄差异分布表明,TW3和GP方法的中位数差异通常非常接近0。就性别而言,获得了关于性别的假设检验结果整个人群和按年龄分组的人群。结果表明,TW3的估计年龄和按年龄排序的年龄之间没有显着差异,GP的程度较小。 TW2被证明是这三种方法中最差的。结论:我们的结果支持以下结论:TW2方法对于用于法医目的的AE不可靠。事实证明,GP和TW3方法在男性中是可靠的。对于女性,发现最好的方法是TW3。在约14岁的受试者中进行法医年龄估算时,建议使用并关联TW3和GP方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号