...
首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >Forensic intelligence framework-Part I: Induction of a transversal model by comparing illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring
【24h】

Forensic intelligence framework-Part I: Induction of a transversal model by comparing illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring

机译:法医情报框架-第一部分:通过比较违禁药物和假身份证件监控得出横向模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Forensic intelligence is a distinct dimension of forensic science. Forensic intelligence processes have mostly been developed to address either a specific type of trace or a specific problem. Even though these empirical developments have led to successes, they are trace-specific in nature and contribute to the generation of silos which hamper the establishment of a more general and transversal model. Forensic intelligence has shown some important perspectives but more general developments are required to address persistent challenges. This will ensure the progress of the discipline as well as its widespread implementation in the future. This paper demonstrates that the description of forensic intelligence processes, their architectures, and the methods for building them can, at a certain level, be abstracted from the type of traces considered. A comparative analysis is made between two forensic intelligence approaches developed independently in Australia and in Europe regarding the monitoring of apparently very different kind of problems: illicit drugs and false identity documents. An inductive effort is pursued to identify similarities and to outline a general model. Besides breaking barriers between apparently separate fields of study in forensic science and intelligence, this transversal model would assist in defining forensic intelligence, its role and place in policing, and in identifying its contributions and limitations. The model will facilitate the paradigm shift from the current case-by-case reactive attitude towards a proactive approach by serving as a guideline for the use of forensic case data in an intelligence-led perspective. A follow-up article will specifically address issues related to comparison processes, decision points and organisational issues regarding forensic intelligence (part II).
机译:法医情报是法医科学的一个独特方面。司法情报程序主要用于解决特定类型的跟踪或特定问题。尽管这些经验性的发展取得了成功,但它们本质上是特定于痕迹的,并导致了筒仓的产生,从而阻碍了更普遍和横向模型的建立。法医情报显示了一些重要的观点,但需要更广泛的发展来应对持续的挑战。这将确保该学科的进展以及将来的广泛实施。本文表明,可以在一定程度上从所考虑的痕迹类型中抽象出司法情报过程,其体系结构以及构建它们的方法的描述。在澳大利亚和欧洲独立开发的两种法证情报方法之间进行了比较分析,涉及监视显然不同的问题:非法药物和伪造身份证件。进行归纳工作以识别相似之处并概述通用模型。这种横向模型除了打破法医科学和情报领域中显然彼此独立的研究领域之间的障碍之外,还将有助于定义法医情报,其在警务领域的作用和地位,并确定其贡献和局限性。该模型将作为情报指导下使用法医案例数据的指南,从而促进范式从当前的案例反应态度转变为主动方法。后续文章将专门讨论与法医情报相关的比较过程,决策点和组织问题有关的问题(第二部分)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号