首页> 外文OA文献 >Forensic intelligence framework. Part II: Study of the main generic building blocks and challenges through the examples of illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring
【2h】

Forensic intelligence framework. Part II: Study of the main generic building blocks and challenges through the examples of illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring

机译:法医智能框架。第二部分:通过非法药物和虚假身份证监测的例子研究主要的通用构建块和挑战

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The development of forensic intelligence relies on the expression of suitable models that better represent the contribution of forensic intelligence in relation to the criminal justice system, policing and security. Such models assist in comparing and evaluating methods and new technologies, provide transparency and foster the development of new applications. Interestingly, strong similarities between two separate projects focusing on specific forensic science areas were recently observed. These observations have led to the induction of a general model (Part I) that could guide the use of any forensic science case data in an intelligence perspective. The present article builds upon this general approach by focusing on decisional and organisational issues. The article investigates the comparison process and evaluation system that lay at the heart of the forensic intelligence framework, advocating scientific decision criteria and a structured but flexible and dynamic architecture. These building blocks are crucial and clearly lay within the expertise of forensic scientists. However, it is only part of the problem. Forensic intelligence includes other blocks with their respective interactions, decision points and tensions (e.g. regarding how to guide detection and how to integrate forensic information with other information). Formalising these blocksidentifies many questions and potential answers. Addressing these questions is essential for the progress of the discipline. Such a process requires clarifying the role and place of the forensic scientist within the whole process and their relationship to other stakeholders.
机译:法医智能的发展依赖于合适模型的表达,更好地代表法医智力与刑事司法系统,警务和安全的贡献。这些模型有助于比较和评估方法和新技术,提供透明度和促进新应用的开发。有趣的是,最近观察到,两个独立的项目之间的强烈相似之处在最近观察到专注于具体的法医学科学领域。这些观察结果导致了可以指导在情报角度来指导任何法医学案例数据的一般模型(第I部分)的归纳。本文通过专注于策略和组织问题,根据这种一般方法建立。本文调查了展示了法医智能框架的核心的比较过程和评估系统,倡导科学决策标准和结构化但灵活的和动态架构。这些构建块至关重要,明确地铺设了法医科学家的专业知识。但是,它只是问题的一部分。法医智能包括其他块,其各自的相互作用,决策点和张力(例如,关于如何指导检测以及如何将法医信息与其他信息集成)。正式化这些块识别很多问题和潜在答案。解决这些问题对于纪律的进度至关重要。这样的过程需要澄清法医科学家在整个过程中的作用和位置以及与其他利益相关者的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号