Smothering of children older than 1 year of age-diagnostic significance of morphological findings.

摘要

A homicide by smothering may leave unobtrusive or even no injuries if the victim is not able to struggle. This is especially true for infants up to 12 months of age. The differentiation between the sudden infant death syndrome and smothering, by an autopsy alone may be impossible. To establish whether this is different in older children because of their rising capacity for defence six cases of smothering in children >1 year of age were re-examined. The age of the children ranged between 1.5 and 7 years (surviving child). The smothering was inflicted with hands in three cases (including the surviving child), with a pillow in two cases, and the way of smothering remained unknown in one case (no confession of the perpetrator). Depending on the tool used for smothering, abrasions on the facial skin (hands, lesser in cases of smothering by a pillow) and petechiae (pillow/hands) could be seen by external examination. The older the children were, the more injuries could be found. Together with circumstantial evidence all cases could have been established by a thorough autopsy. This is important to prevent further offences against (surviving) siblings.