首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >The EDNAP mitochondrial DNA population database (EMPOP) collaborative exercises: organisation, results and perspectives.
【24h】

The EDNAP mitochondrial DNA population database (EMPOP) collaborative exercises: organisation, results and perspectives.

机译:EDNAP线粒体DNA种群数据库(EMPOP)协作练习:组织,结果和观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper presents an overview of the organisation and the results of the collaborative exercises (CE) of the European DNA Profiling (EDNAP) Group's mitochondrial DNA population database project (EMPOP). The aim of the collaborative exercises was to determine whether uniformity of mtDNA sequencing results could be achieved among different laboratories. These were asked to sequence either the complete mtDNA control region or the two hypervariable regions HVI (16024-16365) and HVII (73-340) from DNA extracts, buccal swabs or bloodstains, proceeding in accordance with the protocol and strategies used in each individual laboratory. The results of the collaborative exercises were employed to identify possible sources of errors that could arise during the analysis and interpretation of mtDNA profiles. These findings were taken as a basis to tentatively make suitable arrangements for the construction of a high quality mtDNA database. One hundred fifty mtDNA profiles were submitted to the evaluating laboratory, and disaccording profiles were classified into four groups corresponding to the source of error: clerical errors, sample mix-ups, contaminations and discrepancies with respect to the mtDNA nomenclature. Overall, 14 disaccording haplotypes (16 individual errors) were observed. The errors included 10 clerical errors, 3 interpretation problems, 2 cases of sample mix-up and 1 case of point heteroplasmic mixture, where the 2 sequencing reactions brought inconsistent base calls. This corresponds to an error rate of 10.7% in a virtual mtDNA database consisting of the collaborative exercise results. However, this estimate is still conservative compared to conclusions drawn by authors of meanwhile numerous publications critically reviewing published mtDNA population databases. Our results and earlier published concerns strongly emphasize the need for appropriate safety regulations when mtDNA profiles are compiled for database purposes in order to accomplish the high standard required for mtDNA databases that are used in the forensic context.
机译:本文概述了欧洲DNA分析(EDNAP)组线粒体DNA种群数据库项目(EMPOP)的组织结构和协作演练(CE)的结果。合作演习的目的是确定不同实验室之间是否可以实现mtDNA测序结果的一致性。要求它们对完整的mtDNA控制区或来自DNA提取物,颊拭子或血迹的两个高变区HVI(16024-16365)和HVII(73-340)进行测序,并按照每个人使用的方案和策略进行实验室。协作练习的结果被用于识别在mtDNA谱图分析和解释过程中可能出现的错误来源。这些发现作为基础,为构建高质量的mtDNA数据库进行了适当的安排。将150条mtDNA谱图提交给评估实验室,将不一致的谱图分为四类,分别对应于误差源:文书误差,样品混合,污染和与mtDNA命名法有关的差异。总体而言,观察到14个不一致的单倍型(16个个体错误)。这些错误包括10个文书错误,3个解释问题,2个样品混淆案例和1个点异质混合物案例,其中2个测序反应带来不一致的碱基检出。这对应于由协作练习结果组成的虚拟mtDNA数据库中的错误率为10.7%。但是,与许多出版物严格审查已发表的mtDNA种群数据库的作者的结论相比,该估计仍是保守的。我们的结果和较早发表的关注强烈强调,在为数据库目的编译mtDNA概要文件时,需要适当的安全法规,以实现用于法医环境的mtDNA数据库所需的高标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号