首页> 外文期刊>Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilit >Comparing two screening policies of gestational diabetes mellitus: The Mohammed v Training Military Hospital of Rabat (Morocco) [Comparaison de deux politiques de dépistage du diabète gestationnel: expérience de l'h?pital militaire d'instruction Mohammed V de Rabat (Maroc)]
【24h】

Comparing two screening policies of gestational diabetes mellitus: The Mohammed v Training Military Hospital of Rabat (Morocco) [Comparaison de deux politiques de dépistage du diabète gestationnel: expérience de l'h?pital militaire d'instruction Mohammed V de Rabat (Maroc)]

机译:比较两种妊娠糖尿病筛查策略:穆罕默德诉拉巴特军事训练医院(摩洛哥)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives We wanted to measure the impact of going from a two-step screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (50 g oral glucose tolerance test then 100 g OGTT) to a one-step screening 75 g OGTT (WHO's recommendations). Patients and methods A prospective study was carried out among patients who consulted between July 1st, 2008 and October 31st, 2009. The screening was performed in the first trimester if risk factors were identified and between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation (WG). Results During our period of study of 15 months, 706 pregnant women were included. The prescription of a screening test was performed in 403 women, i.e. 57% of cases. Out of the 403-screened women, 33 had gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) i.e. a 8.2% prevalence rate. In univariate analysis, the following are considered to be risk factors: age, diabetes family history and macrosomia history in a previous pregnancy. Between 24 and 28 WG, 34.34% of the screening tests were achieved. The 75 g OGTT is prescribed in 96.2% of cases as a screening test of GDM but fasting blood glucose is still prescribed in 3.8% of cases. Also, before 12 WG, 75 g OGTT represent 64.7% of the prescribed tests. Discussion Despite the simplification of the GDM screening procedure, our work shows no significant difference of the screening rate and prevalence of GDM between our present study and the first work done in the same service (57% versus 61%, P = 0.7 and 8.2% versus 7.7%, P = 0.9). The GDM risk factors found are also identical between the two studies: age, type 2 diabetes family history and macrosomia history. Moreover, there is a statistically significant improvement in the screening age (23 ± 6.7 versus 20.9 WG ± 6.8 in the first half of 2008, P < 0.001) and the number of tests ordered during the period between 24 and 28 WG (34.34% versus 23.9% in the first half of 2008, P < 0.001). For the GDM screening tests between 24 and 28 WG, 75 g OGTT replaced the 50 g OGTT (test used in the first study), but fasting blood glucose is prescribed in 3.8% of cases knowing that normal fasting blood glucose alone done between 24 and 28 WG has a poor sensitivity and do not exclude the diagnosis of GDM (Cosson, 2006) [11]. Also, before 12 WG, 75 g OGTT represents 64.7% of the prescribed tests. However, there is to date no data to validate load testing before 24 WG. Conclusion Our comparative study revealed maintenance of low implementation of universal screening of GDM despite the simplification of the protocol. Between 24 and 28 WG, 75 g OGTT replaced the 50 g OGTT, but fasting blood glucose was still prescribed. A sensitization meeting involving all intervening persons is to be organized with proposals for corrective actions. The final objective is the systematic screening of gestational diabetes mellitus with the use of fasting blood glucose in the first trimester and the 75 g OGTT between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation.
机译:目的我们想要衡量从妊娠糖尿病的两步筛查(50 g口服葡萄糖耐量试验,然后是100 g OGTT)到一步筛查75 g OGTT(WHO的建议)的影响。患者和方法在2008年7月1日至2009年10月31日之间接受咨询的患者中进行了一项前瞻性研究。如果确定了危险因素,并且在妊娠24至28周(WG)之间进行了筛查。结果在我们为期15个月的研究期间,纳入706名孕妇。 403名妇女(即57%的病例)接受了筛查测试的处方。在403名接受筛查的妇女中,有33名患有妊娠糖尿病(GDM),即患病率为8.2%。在单变量分析中,以下因素被认为是危险因素:年龄,糖尿病家族史和先前妊娠的大儿史。在24至28 WG之间,完成了34.34%的筛选测试。在96.2%的病例中,将75 g OGTT作为GDM的筛查方法,但在3.8%的病例中,仍以空腹血糖作为处方。另外,在12 WG之前,75 g OGTT占规定测试的64.7%。讨论尽管简化了GDM筛查程序,但我们的工作表明,本研究与同一服务中首次完成的工作之间,GDM筛查率和患病率没有显着差异(57%比61%,P = 0.7和8.2%对比7.7%,P = 0.9)。两项研究之间发现的GDM危险因素也相同:年龄,2型糖尿病家族史和巨人病史。此外,筛查年龄(2008年上半年的23±6.7与20.9 WG±6.8相比,P <0.001)和24至28 WG(34.34%vs. 34.34% 2008年上半年占23.9%,P <0.001)。对于24至28 WG的GDM筛查测试,75克OGTT代替了50克OGTT(在第一项研究中使用的测试),但是在3.8%知道仅在24至28 WG之间正常空腹血糖的情况下,规定了空腹血糖。 28 WG的敏感性较差,不能排除对GDM的诊断(Cosson,2006)[11]。另外,在12 WG之前,75 g OGTT占规定测试的64.7%。但是,到目前为止,还没有数据可以验证24 WG之前的负载测试。结论我们的比较研究表明尽管协议简化,但GDM通用筛查的实施仍维持较低水平。在24至28 WG之间,75克OGTT代替了50克OGTT,但仍建议空腹血糖。将组织一次由所有干预人员参加的宣传会议,并提出纠正措施的建议。最终目标是在孕早期和妊娠24至28周之间使用空腹血糖和75 g OGTT对妊娠糖尿病进行系统的筛查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号