...
首页> 外文期刊>Gynecological endocrinology: the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology >Assessment of ovarian reserve after unilateral diathermy with thermal doses adjusted to ovarian volume
【24h】

Assessment of ovarian reserve after unilateral diathermy with thermal doses adjusted to ovarian volume

机译:评估单侧透热后的卵巢储备量,并根据卵巢容量调整热剂量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome seem to have a larger ovarian reserve. However, regardless of a greater reserve, diminished ovarian reserve has been reported after laparoscopic diathermy. The aim of this article was to determine whether the doses adjusted unilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling with diathermy (ULOD) diminishes ovarian reserve to compare with bilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling with diathermy (BLOD). Ninety-six women were assigned in two groups. One group underwent ULOD receiving thermal doses (0-840 J per ovary) adjusted to volume one ovary. The other group underwent BLOD receiving fixed doses (600 J per ovary). Ovarian reserve markers [anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH); antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian volume] were measured before and after surgery (1 and 6 months). Both groups showed a decrease in AMH after surgery, but it was significantly more distinct in the BLOD versus ULOD group (2.0 ng/mL versus 1.3 ng/mL; p = 0.018) in the first follow-up month and remained significantly different through the sixth follow-up month (1.9 ng/mL versus 1.15 ng/mL; p = 0.023). In contrast, in the sixth month, the ULOD versus BLOD showed a significantly greater increase AFC (p < 0.001) and volume (p = 0.013). Our findings evidenced that the dose-adjusted unilateral diathermy (60 J/cm(3)) does not have significant and long-term effects on ovarian reserve.
机译:多囊卵巢综合征女性的卵巢储备似乎更大。但是,无论储备量增加多少,腹腔镜透热疗法后都有卵巢储备减少的报道。本文的目的是确定与经腹泻的双侧腹腔镜卵巢钻孔术(BLOD)相比,调整了带透热疗法的单侧腹腔镜卵巢钻孔术的剂量是否减少了卵巢储备。 96名妇女分为两组。一组接受ULOD,接受热剂量(每个卵巢0-840 J),调整至一个卵巢的体积。另一组接受固定剂量的BLOD(每个卵巢600 J)。卵巢储备标志物[抗Mullerian激素(AMH);术前和术后(1和6个月)测量了“卵泡计数(AFC)和卵巢体积”。两组均显示手术后AMH降低,但BLOD组与ULOD组之间的差异明显得多(2.0 ng / mL对1.3 ng / mL; p = 0.018),并且在整个随访期间均存在显着差异。第六次随访月(1.9 ng / mL对1.15 ng / mL; p = 0.023)。相比之下,在第6个月,ULOD与BLOD相比,AFC(p <0.001)和体积(p = 0.013)显着增加。我们的发现证明,剂量调整后的单侧透热疗法(60 J / cm(3))对卵巢储备没有明显的长期影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号