...
首页> 外文期刊>Gynecological endocrinology: the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology >Comparison of estradiol and progesterone priming/antagonist/letrozole and microdose flare-up protocols for poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
【24h】

Comparison of estradiol and progesterone priming/antagonist/letrozole and microdose flare-up protocols for poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection

机译:雌激素和孕激素引发剂/拮抗剂/来曲唑和微剂量爆发试验方案比较弱反应者接受胞浆内精子注射的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: To compare the effect of the GnRH antagonist/letrozole/ gonadotropin protocol with the microdose GnRH agonist flare-up protocol in poor ovarian responders for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Materials and methods: One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients suspected of having or with a history of poor ovarian response between January 2009 and June 2010, who were undergoing ICSI were enrolled. The microdose flareup (MF) protocol was used in 79 patients and the estradiol+progesterone/letrozole+gonadotropin and GnRH antagonist (EP/ALG) protocol was used in 42 patients. Results: Age of the patients, duration of infertility, basal FSH, the total gonadotropin consumption, duration of stimulation, E2 level on the day of hCG administration, the number of embryo transferred, the fertilization rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and the live birth rate were not statistically different (p>0.05). Only the number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the EP/LGA group (1.7±0.7 versus 2.6±0.6). Conclusion: The EP/LGA protocol has no significant improvement against the microdose flare-up protocol in poor responder patients.
机译:背景:为了比较GnRH拮抗剂/来曲唑/促性腺激素方案与微剂量GnRH激动剂爆发方案在卵巢不良反应者中注射胞浆内精子的效果。材料和方法:纳入2009年1月至2010年6月之间连续接受ICSI的211名怀疑或有卵巢反应不良史的患者。微剂量发作(MF)方案用于79例患者,雌二醇+孕酮/来曲唑+促性腺激素和GnRH拮抗剂(EP / ALG)方案用于42例患者。结果:患者的年龄,不孕时间,基础促卵泡激素,促性腺激素的总消耗量,刺激时间,hCG给药当天的E2水平,转移的胚胎数,受精率,着床率,临床妊娠率和活产率无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。在EP / LGA组中,仅回收的卵母细胞数量明显更高(1.7±0.7对2.6±0.6)。结论:对于反应较差的患者,EP / LGA方案相对于微剂量爆发方案没有明显改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号