首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of ophthalmology >Argon laser punctal therapy versus thermal cautery for the treatment of aqueous deficiency dry eye syndrome.
【24h】

Argon laser punctal therapy versus thermal cautery for the treatment of aqueous deficiency dry eye syndrome.

机译:氩激光泪点疗法与热灼疗法治疗房水缺乏症干眼综合征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The objective of this prospective randomized study was to compare the safety and efficacy of argon laser punctal ablation and electrocautery punctal occlusion in the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye and to correlate standard clinical signs with symptoms in these patients. METHODS: From June 1996 to April 1997 we studied 32 patients (64 eyes) referred to a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital with signs or symptoms of dry eye. Moderate to severe dry eye was confirmed by means of the Schirmer 1 test, fluorescein and rose bengal staining and a visual analogue scale measure of six subjective symptoms. Patients with severe dry eye were randomly assigned to undergo argon laser ablation (17 eyes) or electrocautery occlusion (18 eyes), and were reassessed 2 weeks, 1 month and 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, the laser-treated patients had a peak improvement of 40% in surface wetting at 1 month and improvement of 33% at 6 months; the peak improvement at 6 months in the electrocautery group was 84% (p < 0.05). At 6 months the laser group had a twofold reduction in rose bengal staining, compared with a sevenfold reduction in the electrocautery group (p < 0.05). The electrocautery group had the greatest decrease in fluorescein staining at 6 months (2.8-fold vs. twofold) (p < 0.05). The laser group reported a reduction in symptoms of 31% at 1 month and 14% at 6 months; the corresponding values for the electrocautery group were 55% and 64% (p = 0.02). Posttreatment epiphora was insignificant in both groups. In patients with surface wetting of more than 5 mm at baseline, regular use of Tear-Gel resulted in both objective and subjective improvement. INTERPRETATION: Although argon laser punctal ablation is a safe method of treating aqueous tear deficiency states, with minimal side effects, both subjective and objective improvement were greater with electrocautery punctal occlusion. Intensive use of Tear-Gel offers benefit to patients with debilitating symptoms in whom aqueous tear production is not severely reduced.
机译:背景:这项前瞻性随机研究的目的是比较氩激光泪点消融和电灼性泪点闭塞治疗中度至重度干眼的安全性和有效性,并将标准的临床体征与这些患者的症状相关联。方法:从1996年6月至1997年4月,我们研究了32例(64眼)转诊至大学附属三级医院的干眼症或体征。通过Schirmer 1试验,荧光素和玫瑰红染色以及六种主观症状的视觉模拟量表,证实了中度至重度干眼症。重度干眼患者被随机分配接受氩激光消融(17眼)或电灼闭塞(18眼),并在治疗后2周,1个月和6个月进行重新评估。结果:与基线相比,激光治疗的患者在1个月时的表面润湿性峰值改善了40%,而在6个月时的表面润湿性峰值改善了33%。电灼组在6个月时的峰值改善为84%(p <0.05)。在6个月时,激光组的玫瑰孟加拉染色减少了两倍,而电灼组的减少了七倍(p <0.05)。电灼组在6个月时荧光素染色下降最大(2.8倍对2倍)(p <0.05)。激光组的症状在1个月减少了31%,在6个月减少了14%。电灼组的相应值分别为55%和64%(p = 0.02)。两组的治疗后癫痫发作无关紧要。在基线时表面润湿超过5 mm的患者中,定期使用Tear-Gel可改善客观和主观方面的症状。解释:尽管氩激光点状消融术是治疗房水缺乏症的一种安全方法,且副作用最小,但电灼性点状闭塞术的主观和客观改善都更大。大量使用Tear-Gel可使那些不会严重降低房水泪液产生的使人衰弱的症状的患者受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号