...
首页> 外文期刊>Food Economics >The impact of the Single Farm Payments on the expenditure on fertilizers and crop protection inputs: a comparative study of the Italian agriculture
【24h】

The impact of the Single Farm Payments on the expenditure on fertilizers and crop protection inputs: a comparative study of the Italian agriculture

机译:单一农场付款对肥料和作物保护投入的支出的影响:对意大利农业的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Mid Term Review (MTR) of the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in 2003 sped up the process of policy reforms toward decoupled payments in order to urge agricultural production to respond to market signals. However, since the elimination ofcoupled subsidies could produce a shift in commodity relative prices and decoupled payments could generate "coupled" effects on production, it remains questionable how Single Farm Payment (SFP) alters agricultural intensification. Therefore, through a comparative statistical analysis applied on Italian FADN regional data, this article aims at evaluating whether the MTR had positive impacts on the aggregate expenditure on fertilizers and crop protection inputs. From the results, it is observed that theexpansion of profitable crops like vegetables, flowers, and vineyards, along with the receipt of SFP increased the expenditure of fertilizers and crop protection inputs. Such findings suggest that the MTR has been so far effective in terms of aligning agricultural production to markets' signals, but with the unintended consequence of higher intensification. We deduce that farmers may allocate higher proportions of SFP to purchase fertilizers and crop protection inputs whenever the opportunity for higherprofits is found in those cropping activities requiring a higher intensive use of production' factors. The results indirectly highlight the need to improve the environmental cross-compliance controls and to allocate more CAP funds to agro-environmentalmeasures in order to create the right incentive to farmers for reducing input use and mitigating agricultural intensification.
机译:欧洲共同农业政策(CAP)于2003年进行的中期审查(MTR)加快了对脱钩支付的政策改革进程,以敦促农业生产响应市场信号。但是,由于取消耦合补贴可能会导致商品相对价格发生变化,而去耦付款可能会对生产产生“耦合”效应,因此,单一农场支付(SFP)如何改变农业集约化仍存在疑问。因此,通过对意大利FADN区域数据进行比较统计分析,本文旨在评估MTR是否对化肥和作物保护投入的总支出产生积极影响。从结果可以看出,蔬菜,花卉和葡萄园等有利可图作物的扩大,加上SFP的使用,增加了肥料和作物保护投入的支出。这些发现表明,就使农业生产与市场信号保持一致而言,中期审查一直是有效的,但集约化的结果却出乎意料。我们推断,只要在那些需要更高集约利用生产要素的种植活动中找到更高利润的机会,农民就可以分配更高比例的SFP来购买​​肥料和作物保护投入。结果间接强调需要改进环境交叉遵从控制,并向农业环境措施分配更多的CAP资金,以便为农民创造适当的诱因,以减少投入物使用和减轻农业集约化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号