...
首页> 外文期刊>Food and Drug Law Journal >Guide To Preemption of State-Law Claims Against Class III PMA Medical Devices
【24h】

Guide To Preemption of State-Law Claims Against Class III PMA Medical Devices

机译:关于对III类PMA医疗设备的州法律主张的先发指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Complex and technologically advanced medical devices extend or improve the quality of life of countless Americans. However, if defective in design or manufacture, or if inaccurately labeled, such life-saving devices can turn deadly or cause significant personal pain and injury. Although medical device manufacturers bear primary responsibility for the safety of their products, federal legislation and regulations obligate the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide reasonable assurance that medical devices are safe and effective for their intended use. Both federal and state courts place considerable faith in the ability of FDA to live up to its enormous responsibilities in this area. The scheme of federal regulation impacts whether common law product liability suits may be brought against device manufacturers. Depending on the circumstances, a common law action involving a Class III device subject to premarket approval (PMA) may be preempted by federal law and thereby subject to early dismissal.
机译:复杂和技术先进的医疗设备延长或改善了无数美国人的生活质量。但是,如果设计或制造有缺陷或标签不正确,则此类救生设备可能会致命,或导致严重的人身伤害和伤害。尽管医疗器械制造商对其产品的安全性负有主要责任,但联邦法律和法规规定食品和药物管理局(FDA)有义务合理保证医疗器械可安全有效地用于其预期用途。联邦法院和州法院都对FDA履行其在这一领域的巨大职责的能力抱有极大的信心。联邦法规计划影响是否可能对设备制造商提起普通法产品责任诉讼。视情况而定,联邦法律可能会禁止涉及需要获得上市前批准(PMA)的III类设备的普通法诉讼,从而可能提早撤职。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号