...
首页> 外文期刊>Food and Nutrition Bulletin >Food security indicators after humanitarian interventions including food aid in Zimbabwe
【24h】

Food security indicators after humanitarian interventions including food aid in Zimbabwe

机译:包括津巴布韦的粮食援助在内的人道主义干预之后的粮食安全指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Rural households in contemporary Zimbabwe experience various levels of food insecurity and vulnerability Worsening macroeconomic conditions, a fragile political environment, poor rainfall, low incomes, deteriorating environmental conditions, and the impact of HIV and AIDS characterize their livelihoods Nongovernmental organizations have responded to the situation through a number of food interventions to alleviate food insecurity and povertyObjective To provide an analysis of food security indicators used to assess households benefiting from food interventions in 2006 in ZimbabweMethods A total of 60 households were chosen for each of three districts (Uzumba-Maramba-Pfungwe [UMP], Chivi, and Tsholotsho), targeting beneficiaries of the Agricultural Protracted Relief Programme Household food security indicators calculated on the basis of data collected by questionnaire included the Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), months of food shortages, and the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) Districts were compared by analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc analysisResults The mean HDDS differed between the districts, households in Chivi consumed foods from a greater variety of groups than households in Tsholotsho and UMP (4 7 vs 27 and 3 0, respectively, p < 001) Food shortages during the previous year were experienced by 76 4% of the households, with UMP having the lowest occurrence of food shortages (56 7%) and Tsholotsho the highest (95%) Households in Tsholotsho experienced hunger throughout the year, for households in UMP and Chivi, October to January were the critical months when households experienced the most hunger Spearman correlation analysis showed an inverse correlation between HFIAS and HDDS (r = -0425, p < 01) Households that experienced food shortages the previous year had a lower mean HDDS (3 2 vs 3 9, p = 013) and a higher mean HFIAS (17 1 vs 120, p < 001) than households that did not experience food shortagesConclusions The study demonstrated the value of using a variety and combination of indicators in the design of food security interventions The HDDS showed that beyond availability, food security also involves access to a variety of nutritious foods The indicator pertaining to months of food shortages allows a deeper understanding of the nature of food insecurity, hunger in Tsholotsho is experienced throughout the year, implying that the causes are chronic rather than seasonal, whereas Chilli and UMP experience seasonal hunger The HFIAS usefully revealed the condition of food security in each site in terms of the availability, stability, and intake of food
机译:背景技术当代津巴布韦的农村家庭经历了各种程度的粮食不安全和脆弱性,宏观经济状况恶化,脆弱的政治环境,降雨不足,收入低,环境状况恶化以及艾滋病毒和艾滋病的影响是其生计的特征。通过一系列旨在减轻粮食不安全和贫困的粮食干预措施目的提供对用于评估津巴布韦2006年受益于粮食干预措施的家庭的粮食安全指标的方法方法为三个地区(Uzumba-Maramba-Pfungwe)中的每一个地区总共选择了60户家庭[UMP],Chivi和Tsholotsho)针对农业持久救济计划的受益者根据问卷调查收集的数据计算出的家庭粮食安全指标包括家庭饮食多样性评分(HDDS),粮食短缺月份和家庭粮食不安全通过方差分析和Tukey事后分析对urity Access Scale(HFIAS)区域进行了比较结果结果各区域之间的平均HDDS有所不同,Chivi的家庭消费的食物种类比Tsholotsho和UMP的家庭更多(4 7 vs 27和3分别为0,p <001)上一年的食物短缺发生率达到了76 4%的家庭,其中UMP发生食物短缺的发生率最低(56 7%),而Tsholotsho发生的食物短缺发生率最高(95%)对于UMP和Chivi的家庭来说,全年的饥饿程度是10月至1月,这是家庭经历饥饿最严重的关键月份。Spearman相关分析显示,HFIAS和HDDS之间呈反相关关系(r = -0425,p <01)经历食物的家庭与没有食物短缺的家庭相比,前一年的短缺的平均HDDS较低(3 2 vs 3 9,p = 013),平均HFIAS较高(17 1 vs 120,p <001)。 udy展示了在设计粮食安全干预措施时使用多种指标的组合的价值HDDS显示,在可获得性之外,粮食安全还涉及获取各种营养食品。与数月粮食短缺有关的指标使人们对由于粮食不安全的性质,全年在Tsholotsho都经历了饥饿,这表明原因是长期的,而不是季节性的,而Chilli和UMP则经历了季节性的饥饿。HFIAS有效地揭示了每个地点的粮食安全状况,稳定性和食物摄入量

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号