...
首页> 外文期刊>California Agriculture >Accuracy of cotton-planting forecasts assessed in the San Joaquin Valley
【24h】

Accuracy of cotton-planting forecasts assessed in the San Joaquin Valley

机译:圣华金河谷评估的棉花种植预报的准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the first evaluation of its kind, we found that the UC Cooperative Extension (UCCE) 5-day degree-day forecast for cotton-planting conditions performed well in Bakersfield and Fresno when compared with the actual, observed temperatures from 1998 to2002. In most cases, the forecast provided timely advice during the critical cotton-planting period. On average, only 7% of the forecasts failed to predict unfavorable conditions. Better-than-expected weather occurred 9% of the time when unfavorable conditions were forecast. On average during the 22 planting days of March (beginning March 10, the first allowable planting date in the San Joaquin Valley), 2.5 days (11%) were incorrectly forecast to have better-than-unfavorable planting conditions. In April, the cotton -planting forecasts were more reliable, with only 1 day out of 30 (3%), on average, thai may have required replanting because of unpredicted, unfavorable conditions.
机译:在此类评估中,我们发现,与1998年至2002年的实际观测温度相比,在贝克斯菲尔德和弗雷斯诺的UC合作延期(UCCE)5天度日预测在Bakersfield和Fresno表现良好。在大多数情况下,预报在关键的棉花种植期间提供了及时的建议。平均而言,只有7%的预测无法预测不利条件。 9%的时间是在预报不利条件时发生的天气好于预期。在3月的22个播种日(从3月10日开始,是圣华金河谷的第一个允许播种日期)中,平均有2.5天(11%)被错误地预测为具有优于不利播种的条件。 4月份,棉花种植的预报更为可靠,平均30天中只有1天(3%),因为不可预测的不利条件,泰国可能需要补种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号