首页> 外文期刊>Fertility and Sterility: Official Journal of the American Fertility Society, Pacific Coast Fertility Society, and the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society >Fertility treatments and outcomes among couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective fertility cohort in the United States.
【24h】

Fertility treatments and outcomes among couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective fertility cohort in the United States.

机译:寻求生育护理的夫妇的生育治疗和结局:来自美国预期生育队列的数据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between number of fertility treatment cycles and pregnancy rates. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight community and academic infertility practices. PATIENT(S): Four hundred eight (408) couples presenting for an infertility evaluation. INTERVENTION(S): Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Incidence of pregnancy. Cox regression analysis compared the efficacy of cycle-based fertility treatments with no cycle-based fertility treatment after multivariable adjustment. RESULT(S): Couples using one to two medications-only cycles had a significantly higher pregnancy rate (hazard ratio [HR] 4.7 [95% confidence interval 1.3-16.6]), a benefit that did not persist after three or more cycles (HR 0.6 [0.1-3.2]). Couples using IUI for one (HR 2.9 [1.4-5.8]), two (HR 2.0 [0.9-4.5]), and three cycles (HR 4.5 [1.8-10.9]) were more likely to achieve a pregnancy. No additional benefit was seen for couples using four or more IUI cycles (HR 1.0 [0.4-2.6]). In vitro fertilization was associated with significant benefit for couples using one (HR 2.8 [1.5-5.2]) and two cycles (HR 2.2 [1.2-4.1]). Couples using three or more IVF cycles had a non-statistically significant higher likelihood of pregnancy (HR 1.3 [0.7-2.4]). CONCLUSION(S): Cycle-based fertility treatments may offer a point of diminishing returns for infertile couples: two cycles of medications only, three cycles of IUI, and two cycles of IVF.
机译:目的:确定生育治疗周期数与妊娠率之间的关系。设计:前瞻性队列研究。地点:八种社区和学术不育行为。患者:四百八十对(408)对夫妇进行不育评估。干预措施:面对面和电话访谈和问卷调查。主要观察指标:妊娠率。 Cox回归分析比较了多变量调整后基于周期的生育力治疗与没有基于周期的生育力治疗的疗效。结果:仅使用一到两个药物疗程的夫妇妊娠率明显更高(危险比[HR] 4.7 [95%置信区间1.3-16.6]),这种益处在三个或三个以上的疗程后并未持续( HR 0.6 [0.1-3.2])。使用IUI一次(HR 2.9 [1.4-5.8]),两次(HR 2.0 [0.9-4.5])和三个周期(HR 4.5 [1.8-10.9])的夫妇更有可能怀孕。对于使用四个或更多IUI周期的夫妇,没有发现其他好处(HR 1.0 [0.4-2.6])。使用一对(HR 2.8 [1.5-5.2])和两个周期(HR 2.2 [1.2-4.1])的夫妇,体外受精会带来显着收益。使用三个或三个以上IVF周期的夫妻怀孕的可能性在统计学上不显着(HR 1.3 [0.7-2.4])。结论:基于周期的生育治疗可能为不育夫妇带来收益递减点:仅两个周期的药物治疗,三个IUI周期和两个IVF周期。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号