首页> 外文期刊>Fertility and Sterility: Official Journal of the American Fertility Society, Pacific Coast Fertility Society, and the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society >Circulating basal anti-Mullerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
【24h】

Circulating basal anti-Mullerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

机译:在体外受精的卵巢刺激中,循环的基础抗穆勒激素水平可预测卵巢反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical value of basal anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) measurements compared with other available determinants, apart from chronologic age, in the prediction of ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center for reproductive medicine and an IVF unit. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing their first cycle of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization (IVF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Basal levels of FSH and AMH as well as antral follicle count (AFC) were measured in 165 subjects. All patients were followed prospectively and their cycle outcomes recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Predictive value of FSH, AMH, and AFC for extremes of ovarian response to stimulation. RESULT(S): Out of the 165 women, 134 were defined as normal responders, 15 as poor responders, and 16 as high responders. Subjects in the poor response group were significantly older then those in the other two groups. Anti-Mullerian hormone levels and AFC were markedly raised in the high responders and decreased in the poor responders. Compared with FSH and AFC, AMH performed better in the prediction of excessive response to ovarian stimulation-AMH area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC(AUC)) 0.81, FSH ROC(AUC) 0.66, AFC ROC(AUC) 0.69. For poor response, AMH (ROC(AUC) 0.88) was a significantly better predictor than FSH (ROC(AUC) 0.63) but not AFC (ROC(AUC) 0.81). AMH prediction of ovarian response was independent of age and PCOS. Anti-Mullerian hormone cutoffs of >3.75 ng/mL and <1.0 ng/mL would have modest sensitivity and specificity in predicting the extremes of response. CONCLUSION(S): Circulating AMH has the ability to predict excessive and poor response to stimulation with exogenous gonadotrophins. Overall, this biomarker is superior to basal FSH and AFC, and has the potential to be incorporated in to work-up protocols to predict patient's ovarian response to treatment and to individualize strategies aiming at reducing the cancellation rate and the iatrogenic complications of COH.
机译:目的:为了评估卵巢对促性腺激素刺激的反应,与基础年龄相比,评估基础抗穆勒激素(AMH)与其他可用决定因素的临床价值。设计:前瞻性队列研究。地点:生殖医学三级转诊中心和一个试管婴儿科。患者:正在经历第一个受控卵巢过度刺激(COH)周期以进行体外受精(IVF)的妇女。材料与方法:在165名受试者中测量了FSH和AMH的基础水平以及窦房卵计数(AFC)。所有患者均接受前瞻性随访,并记录其周期结局。主要观察指标:FSH,AMH和AFC对于卵巢对刺激的极端反应的预测值。结果:在165名妇女中,有134名被定义为正常反应者,有15名是差反应者,有16名是高反应者。反应差的组的受试者明显比其他两组的受试者年龄大。抗Mullerian激素水平和AFC在高反应者中明显升高,而在较弱反应者中降低。与FSH和AFC相比,在接收器工作特征曲线(ROC(AUC))0.81,FSH ROC(AUC)0.66,AFC ROC(AUC)0.69下,AMH在预测卵巢刺激-AMH区域过度反应方面表现更好。对于较差的响应,AMH(ROC(AUC)0.88)比FSH(ROC(AUC)0.63)更好,但AFC(ROC(AUC)0.81)则更好。 AMH对卵巢反应的预测与年龄和PCOS无关。 > 3.75 ng / mL和<1.0 ng / mL的抗穆勒氏激素截止值在预测反应极端情况时将具有适度的敏感性和特异性。结论:循环AMH具有预测外源促性腺激素刺激过度和不良反应的能力。总体而言,该生物标志物优于基础FSH和AFC,并有可能被纳入检查方案中,以预测患者的卵巢对治疗的反应,并制定旨在降低COH消除率和医源性并发症的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号