【24h】

Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique.

机译:精液制备方法和精子凋亡:游动法与梯度密度离心技术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of density-gradient centrifugation and swim-up on sperm apoptosis by using a multiparameter flow cytometric method. DESIGN: Autocontrolled split-sample study. SETTING: Tertiary infertility center. PATIENT(S): Sixty-two male partners of couples undergoing infertility investigations. INTERVENTION(S): Each sample was analyzed both before and after semen preparation by optical microscopy and by flow cytometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Percentage of viable, apoptotic, and necrotic sperm and recovery rate of total motile, progressive motile, and viable sperm before and after the two sperm preparation methods. RESULT(S): Compared with the original semen, the mean percentages of apoptotic and necrotic sperm were significantly lower after both sperm preparation methods. The mean percentage of viable sperm was significantly higher after swim-up compared with gradient centrifugation. The recovery rates of total motile, progressive motile, and viable sperm were significantly higher using gradient centrifugation compared with swim-up. The viable sperm percentage and the progressive sperm motility were significant predictors for negative difference between the two methods in terms of viable sperm percentage after preparation. CONCLUSION(S): Both sperm preparation methods allow obtaining a sperm population with a low percentage of apoptotic sperm. Therefore, the risk of using apoptotic sperm for clinical treatment seems to be rather low. The choice of method will depend on whether IVF/ICSI or intrauterine insemination is to be performed.
机译:目的:采用多参数流式细胞术比较密度梯度离心法和游动法对精子凋亡的影响。设计:自动控制的拆分样本研究。地点:三级不孕中心。患者:接受不育调查的夫妻中的62名男性伴侣。干预:通过光学显微镜和流式细胞仪分析精液制备前后的每个样品。主要观察指标:在两种精子制备方法之前和之后,活精子,凋亡精子和坏死精子的百分比以及总精子,进行精子和活精子的回收率。结果:与原始精液相比,两种精子制备方法后凋亡和坏死精子的平均百分比均显着降低。与梯度离心相比,游泳后精子的平均存活百分比显着更高。与游泳相比,使用梯度离心分离的总能动性,进行性能动性和活精子的回收率显着更高。就制备后的活精子百分比而言,活精子百分数和进行性精子活力是两种方法之间存在负差的重要预测指标。结论:两种精子制备方法均能获得凋亡精子百分比低的精子群体。因此,使用凋亡精子进行临床治疗的风险似乎较低。方法的选择取决于是否要进行IVF / ICSI或宫内授精。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号