首页> 外文期刊>Fertility and Sterility: Official Journal of the American Fertility Society, Pacific Coast Fertility Society, and the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society >Transvaginal versus transabdominal ultrasound guidance for embryo transfer in donor oocyte recipients: a randomized clinical trial.
【24h】

Transvaginal versus transabdominal ultrasound guidance for embryo transfer in donor oocyte recipients: a randomized clinical trial.

机译:经阴道超声与经腹超声对供体卵母细胞受体胚胎移植的指导:一项随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy and implantation rates with transvaginal (TV) versus transabdominal (TA) ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (ET). DESIGN: Randomized, clinical trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01137461). SETTING: Private, infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Three-hundred thirty randomized recipients of donor oocytes. INTERVENTION(S): Embryo transfer using TV (with empty bladder, using the Kitazato ET Long catheter) versus TA ultrasound guidance (with full bladder, using the echogenic Sure View Wallace catheter). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Overall pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, implantation, and ongoing pregnancy rates. Duration and difficulty of ET. Patient-reported uterine cramping and discomfort, as evaluated by questionnaire. RESULT(S): No statistically significant differences were observed in clinical pregnancy 50.9% versus 49.4% (95% confidence interval of the difference: -9.2 to +12.2%), implantation 34.5% versus 31.4% (95% CI of the difference: -4 to +10.3%) between the TV and TA ultrasound-guided groups. Transfer difficulty (6% versus 4.2%) and uterine cramping (27.2% versus 18.3%) were not statistically significantly different between treatment groups. Total duration (154+/-119 versus 85+/-76 seconds) was statistically significantly higher in the TV ultrasound group. Light to moderate-severe discomfort related to bladder distension was reported by 63% of the patients in the TA ultrasound group. CONCLUSION(S): Transvaginal ultrasound-guided ET yielded similar success rates compared with the TA ultrasound-guided procedure without requiring the assistance of a sonographer. It was associated with increased patient comfort due to the absence of bladder distension.
机译:目的:比较经阴道(TV)和经腹(TA)超声引导的胚胎移植(ET)的妊娠率和着床率。设计:在Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT 01137461)注册的随机临床试验。地点:私人不孕诊所。患者:330个随机捐赠的卵母细胞受体。干预:使用电视(空膀胱,使用Kitazato ET Long导管)与TA超声引导(使用全膀胱,使用回声Sure View Wallace导管)进行胚胎移植。主要观察指标:总体妊娠,临床妊娠,着床和持续妊娠率。持续时间和难度。患者通过问卷调查报告子宫痉挛和不适。结果:在临床妊娠中50.9%对49.4%(差异的95%置信区间:-9.2至+ 12.2%),植入34.5%对31.4%(差异95%的CI:未观察到统计学上的显着差异:电视和TA超声引导组之间的差异为-4至+ 10.3%)。治疗组之间的转移困难(6%对4.2%)和子宫痉挛(27.2%对18.3%)在统计学上没有显着差异。电视超声组的总持续时间(154 +/- 119对85 +/- 76秒)在统计学上显着更高。 TA超声组中63%的患者报告了与膀胱扩张相关的轻度至中度重度不适。结论:经阴道超声引导的ET与TA超声引导的手术相比取得了相似的成功率,而无需超声医师的协助。由于没有膀胱扩张,它与增加的患者舒适度有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号