...
首页> 外文期刊>Field Crops Research >Use of agro-climatic zones to upscale simulated crop yield potential
【24h】

Use of agro-climatic zones to upscale simulated crop yield potential

机译:利用农业气候区来提升模拟作物的产量潜力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Yield gap analysis, which evaluates magnitude and variability of difference between crop yield potential (Yp) or water limited yield potential (Yw) and actual farm yields, provides a measure of untapped food production capacity. Reliable location-specific estimates of yield gaps, either derived from research plots or simulation models, are available only for a limited number of locations and crops due to cost and time required for field studies or for obtaining data on long-term weather, crop rotations and management practices, and soil properties. Given these constraints, we compare global agro-climatic zonation schemes for suitability to up-scale location-specific estimates of Yp and Yw, which are the basis for estimating yield gaps at regional, national, and global scales. Six global climate zonation schemes were evaluated for climatic homogeneity within delineated climate zones (CZs) and coverage of crop area. An efficient CZ scheme should strike an effective balance between zone size and number of zones required to cover a large portion of harvested area of major food crops. Climate heterogeneity was very large in CZ schemes with less than 100 zones. Of the other four schemes, the Global Yield Gap Atlas Extrapolation Domain (GYGA-ED) approach, based on a matrix of three categorical variables (growing degree days, aridity index, temperature seasonality) to delineate CZs for harvested area of all major food crops, achieved reasonable balance between number of CZs to cover 80% of global crop area and climate homogeneity within zones. While CZ schemes derived from two climate-related categorical variables require a similar number of zones to cover 80% of crop area, within-zone heterogeneity is substantially greater than for the GYGA-ED for mostweather variables that are sensitive drivers of crop production. Some CZ schemes are crop-specific, which limits utility for up-scaling location-specific evaluation of yield gaps in regions with crop rotations rather than single crop species.
机译:产量差距分析评估了作物单产潜力(Yp)或水分有限单产潜力(Yw)与农场实际产量之间差异的大小和变异性,提供了一种尚未开发的粮食生产能力的度量。由于田间研究或获取长期天气,作物轮作数据所需的成本和时间,只能从有限的位置和农作物中获得可靠的,针对特定地点的产量差距估算,无论是从研究地块还是模拟模型得出和管理规范以及土壤特性。鉴于这些限制,我们比较了全球农业气候区划方案的适用性,以适合对Yp和Yw进行特定位置的高档估算,这是在区域,国家和全球规模上估算产量差距的基础。对六个全球气候区划方案进行了评估,以评估划定的气候区(CZs)和作物覆盖范围内的气候均匀性。高效的零排放区计划应在区域面积和覆盖主要粮食作物大部分收获面积所需的区域数量之间取得有效的平衡。在不到100个区域的CZ方案中,气候异质性非常大。在其他四个方案中,全球产量差距图集外推域(GYGA-ED)方法基于三个分类变量(生长程度日,干旱指数,温度季节性)的矩阵来描绘所有主要粮食作物收获面积的CZ ,在覆盖全球80%作物面积的CZ数量与区域内的气候均匀性之间实现了合理的平衡。虽然从两个与气候有关的类别变量得出的CZ方案要求覆盖80%的作物面积的区域数量相似,但对于大多数天气变量而言,该区域内异质性要比GYGA-ED大得多,这是作物生产的敏感驱动因素。一些CZ方案是特定于作物的,这限制了在具有作物轮换而不是单一作物物种的地区中,扩大位置特定评估产量差距的效用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号