首页> 外文期刊>Field Crops Research >Heat stress in temperate and tropical maize hybrids: a novel approach for assessing sources of kernel loss in field conditions.
【24h】

Heat stress in temperate and tropical maize hybrids: a novel approach for assessing sources of kernel loss in field conditions.

机译:温带和热带玉米杂交种的热应激:一种评估田间条件下籽粒损失来源的新方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Temperate and tropical maize differ in their tolerance to heat stress but the ecophysiological bases for genotypic differences are poorly understood. Our objectives were (i) to assess the sources of kernel loss, and (ii) to identify the main differences in these traits among genotypes of contrasting genetic background. We used the classic relationships that associate final kernel number per plant (KNP) with plant (PGRCP) and ear (EGRCP) growth rates during the critical period for kernel set and developed an alternative approach based on the combined analysis of these relationships for assessing sources of kernel loss in field conditions. We identified three sources of loss associated with (i) PGRCP reductions ( Delta KNP1), (ii) changes in biomass partitioning to the ear ( Delta KNP2), and (iii) constraints not directly related to assimilate allocation to the ear ( Delta KNP3). A partitioning index was also established (PI=EGRCP PGRCP-1). Field experiments included three contrasting maize hybrids (Te: temperate; Tr: tropical; TeTr: Te x Tr) grown under two temperature regimes (control and heated) during daytime hours. We tested heating (ca. 33-40 degrees C at ear level) along two 15-d periods (GS1: pre-anthesis; GS2: from silking onwards). Final KNP was severely reduced by heating, and this negative effect was larger (i) when it occurred during silking (-75% for GS2) than before anthesis (-52% for GS1), and (ii) for the Te hybrid (-77%) than the TeTr (-69%) and the Tr (-44%) hybrids. The contribution of each source of loss to the decrease in KNP was 47% for Delta KNP1, 27% for Delta KNP2, and 32% for Delta KNP3. Variations in Delta KNP2 were explained by changes in PI (r2=0.85, P<0.001), and a critical PI value (0.25) for avoiding kernel loss due to Delta KNP2 was established. A similar pattern among genotypes was found for the response of KNP to variations in both PGRCP and EGRCP, but the new approach indicated that enhanced tolerance of the tropical genotype was mainly associated with reduced Delta KNP3.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.009
机译:温带和热带玉米对热胁迫的耐受性不同,但是人们对基因型差异的生态生理基础了解甚少。我们的目标是(i)评估籽粒损失的来源,以及(ii)识别遗传背景不同的基因型之间这些性状的主要差异。我们使用经典关系式,将核心植物关键时期的每株植物最终籽粒数(KNP)与植物(PGR CP )和穗(EGR CP )的生长速率相关联并根据这些关系的综合分析开发了一种替代方法,用于评估田间条件下籽粒损失的来源。我们确定了与(i)PGR CP 减少(Delta KNP 1 ),(ii)生物量分配到耳朵的变化(Delta KNP 2 ),以及(iii)与同化分配到耳朵没有直接关系的约束条件(Delta KNP 3 )。还建立了一个分区索引(PI = EGR CP PGR CP -1 )。田间试验包括在白天在两种温度(控制和加热)条件下生长的三种对比玉米杂交种(Te:温带; Tr:热带; TeTr:Te x Tr)。我们测试了两个15天(GS 1 :前花期; GS 2 :从丝滑开始)的加热(耳朵水平约33-40摄氏度)。 。最终的KNP会因加热而严重降低,这种负面影响(i)发生在蚕丝期(GS 2 为-75%)比花期前(GS 1为-52%)大。 ),以及(ii)Te杂种(-77%)比TeTr(-69%)和Tr(-44%)杂种。每种损失来源对KNP下降的贡献分别为Delta KNP 1 47%,Delta KNP 2 27%和Delta KNP 32% 3 。 ΔKNP 2 的变化可以通过PI的变化来解释(r 2 = 0.85,P <0.001),以及避免由于以下原因导致的内核损失的临界PI值(0.25)。建立了Delta KNP 2 。在基因型之间发现了KNP对PGR CP 和EGR CP 变化的响应的相似模式,但是新方法表明,热带基因型的耐受性主要是增强的。与减少的Delta KNP 3 相关联。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.009

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号